> Right, it miscomputes the location of the second loop variable and
> assumes it's declared inside the block.
Fixed with patch 9.0.0535
--
"Microsoft is like Coke. It's a secret formula, all the money is from
distribution, and their goal is to get Coke everywhere. Open source is like
On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 05:14, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Let's try to summarize:
This sounds good to me.
Thanks,
Doug
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
Let's try to summarize:
1. The loop variable in a Vim9 script and a compiled function behave
differently, we expect them to work the same way. In a script the
variable can't be found after the loop, it has been deleted. In a
compiled function it can be used by a closure executed
