Re: [vim/vim] Where do we see work for v8? (#900)

2016-10-06 Fir de Conversatie João Miguel
A 2016-10-05T22:51:22 -0700, vim-dev ML escreveu: > Am 2016-10-06 07:25, schrieb MadMaverick9: > > And yes - I choose to ignore this sentence, because QA is the > > developer's problem. Users & distro maintainers care more about stable > > code. The releases [1] directory here is a joke me thinks.

Re: [vim/vim] Where do we see work for v8? (#900)

2016-07-04 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Justin M. Keyes wrote: > On Jul 3, 2016 14:57, "Christian Brabandt" > wrote: > > > > Closed #900. > > The master branch is indeed used as Bram's experimental branch, waiting for > bug reports before a feature is mature. > > It would be great if credit were given to Neovim for the concepts vett

Re: [vim/vim] Where do we see work for v8? (#900)

2016-07-03 Fir de Conversatie Justin M. Keyes
On Jul 3, 2016 14:57, "Christian Brabandt" wrote: > > Closed #900. The master branch is indeed used as Bram's experimental branch, waiting for bug reports before a feature is mature. It would be great if credit were given to Neovim for the concepts vetted there. So far I have seen no acknowledge