On 2016-07-09, Manuel Ortega wrote:
> call and call() are also. But I don't think it makes confusing.
>
>
> But it does, for new users and people learning VimScript. I'm not confused
> *anymore* about :substitute/substitute(), because I've now done a ton of
> vimscripting. But when I was
>
> call and call() are also. But I don't think it makes confusing.
But it does, for new users and people learning VimScript. I'm not confused
*anymore* about :substitute/substitute(), because I've now done a ton of
vimscripting. But when I was new, I can't tell you how many times that
messed
On Sunday, July 10, 2016 at 1:35:22 AM UTC+9, Manuel Ortega wrote:
> I don't have positive suggestion for an alternative, but...
>
>
> Please, please don't name the new function "execute()". It only breeds
> confusion because there is already a command called "execute". It really
> sucks
I don't have positive suggestion for an alternative, but...
Please, please don't name the new function "execute()". It only breeds
confusion because there is already a command called "execute". It really
sucks when this happens, like with substitute() and :substitute. New users
get confused,