Lech Lorens wrote:
> On 14-Mar-2010 Dominique Pellé wrote:
> >
> > So the position of the cursor is wrong. I think
> > curwin->w_cursor.lnum is 0 because it's set
> > in popupmnu.c:643 to 0:
> >
> > 643 curwin->w_cursor.lnum = 0;
> >
> > If I replace this line with...
> >
Lech Lorens wrote:
> On 14-Mar-2010 Dominique Pellé wrote:
>> $ hg diff popupmnu.c
>> diff -r aab202d244b6 src/popupmnu.c
>> --- a/src/popupmnu.c Wed Mar 10 17:16:12 2010 +0100
>> +++ b/src/popupmnu.c Sun Mar 14 10:50:53 2010 +0100
>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
>>
>> curbuf->b_change
On 14-Mar-2010 Dominique Pellé wrote:
>
> So the position of the cursor is wrong. I think
> curwin->w_cursor.lnum is 0 because it's set
> in popupmnu.c:643 to 0:
>
> 643 curwin->w_cursor.lnum = 0;
>
> If I replace this line with...
>
> 643 curwin->w_curs
Dasn wrote:
> Hello guys.
>
> I recently caught an E38 (Null argument).
>
> gvim -u NONE "+so trap_e38.vim"
>
> (the trap_e38.vim is in attachment)
>
> :version
> VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Mar 13 2010 09:32:48)
> MS-Windows 32-bit GUI version
> Included patches: 1-394
> Compiled
Hello guys.
I recently caught an E38 (Null argument).
gvim -u NONE "+so trap_e38.vim"
(the trap_e38.vim is in attachment)
:version
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Mar 13 2010 09:32:48)
MS-Windows 32-bit GUI version
Included patches: 1-394
Compiled by administra...@bla
Big version