On Monday, November 10, 2014 12:41:06 PM UTC-6, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Ben!
>
> On Mo, 10 Nov 2014, Ben Fritz wrote:
>
> > On Monday, November 10, 2014 10:25:55 AM UTC-6, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > > Am 2014-11-10 14:51, schrieb Ben Fritz:
> > > > I've noticed this myself over the last
Hi Ben!
On Mo, 10 Nov 2014, Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Monday, November 10, 2014 10:25:55 AM UTC-6, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Am 2014-11-10 14:51, schrieb Ben Fritz:
> > > I've noticed this myself over the last few years I've been using the
> > > mapping. Especially this is apparent in operator-pe
On Monday, November 10, 2014 10:25:55 AM UTC-6, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Am 2014-11-10 14:51, schrieb Ben Fritz:
> > I've noticed this myself over the last few years I've been using the
> > mapping. Especially this is apparent in operator-pending mode. It
> > looks like some sort of bug in Vim.
Am 2014-11-10 14:51, schrieb Ben Fritz:
I've noticed this myself over the last few years I've been using the
mapping. Especially this is apparent in operator-pending mode. It
looks like some sort of bug in Vim. I thought I reported it before but
I can't find it now.
I think the explicit redraw
On Sunday, November 9, 2014 11:53:38 AM UTC-6, Eric Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014, Ben Fritz wrote:
> >
> > if exists('+relativenumber')
> > nnoremap CycleLNum()
> > xnoremap CycleLNum()
> > onoremap CycleLNum()
> >
> > " function to cycle between normal, relative, an
