Charles Campbell wrote:
> Maxim Kim wrote:
> >
> >
> > like a `zp` command, that does not add any trailing spaces.
> >
> >
> > Btw if you paste at the end of the `;text` no trailing spaces would be
> > added.
> >
> Well, that messes with my own zp and zP maps, but no problem. I've also
>
Maxim Kim wrote:
like a `zp` command, that does not add any trailing spaces.
Btw if you paste at the end of the `;text` no trailing spaces would be
added.
Well, that messes with my own zp and zP maps, but no problem. I've also
overridden p and P with them, so I can just eliminate zp
On Do, 27 Mai 2021, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Christian wrote:
>
> > On Di, 25 Mai 2021, Andre Tann wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I repeatedly have the following situation, and wonder how it can be
> > > handled
> > > better than I do it now. These lines must be merged
> > >
> > >
пятница, 28 мая 2021 г. в 10:42:17 UTC+3, Maxim Kim:
>
>> Here you can only yank a block including the spaces, and they would also
>> be inserted with "zp". Perhaps we should also have a "zy" command to
>> exclude the trailing spaces when yanking. I think that's better than
>> having "zp"
>
> Here you can only yank a block including the spaces, and they would also
> be inserted with "zp". Perhaps we should also have a "zy" command to
> exclude the trailing spaces when yanking. I think that's better than
> having "zp" drop spaces that were yanked.
>
>
What about "zd" then?
>
>
> like a `zp` command, that does not add any trailing spaces.
>
>
Btw if you paste at the end of the `;text` no trailing spaces would be
added.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more
Christian wrote:
> On Di, 25 Mai 2021, Andre Tann wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I repeatedly have the following situation, and wonder how it can be handled
> > better than I do it now. These lines must be merged
> >
> > /path/subdir;text
> > /path/longsubdir;text
> >
On Di, 25 Mai 2021, Andre Tann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I repeatedly have the following situation, and wonder how it can be handled
> better than I do it now. These lines must be merged
>
> /path;text
> /path;text
> /path;text
>
> with these:
>
> /subdir
> /longsubdir
> /longlongsubdir
>
>
