Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:39:28 AM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote:
> >
> > I thought your sort could be done in Vim with 2 passes, but unfortunately
> > it does not work:
> >
> > sort r /^\d\+/
> > sort! /.*#/
>
> Bram, any chance that a way to guarantee a stable sort could be
>
Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:48:53 AM UTC-5, Jun T. wrote:
> > 2014/06/26 23:09, Ben Fritz wrote:
> > > Could this be fixed, by using (l2.lnum - l1.lnum) rather than
> > > (l1.lnum - l2.lnum) if lines are equal, when using reverse sort?
> >
> > Well... the change is easy (se
Jun Takimoto wrote:
> 2014/06/26 01:07, Ben Fritz wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:39:28 AM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought your sort could be done in Vim with 2 passes, but
> >> unfortunately it does not work:
> >>
> >> sort r /^\d\+/
> >> sort! /.*#/
> >>
> >
> > Bram
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:48:53 AM UTC-5, Jun T. wrote:
> 2014/06/26 23:09, Ben Fritz wrote:
>
> > Could this be fixed, by using (l2.lnum - l1.lnum) rather than
>
> > (l1.lnum - l2.lnum) if lines are equal, when using reverse sort?
>
>
>
> Well... the change is easy (see the patch below),
2014/06/26 23:09, Ben Fritz wrote:
> Could this be fixed, by using (l2.lnum - l1.lnum) rather than
> (l1.lnum - l2.lnum) if lines are equal, when using reverse sort?
Well... the change is easy (see the patch below), but I think the
current behavior of :sort! is a 'feature', not a bug. Changing
i
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 8:06:34 AM UTC-5, Jun T. wrote:
> 2014/06/26 01:07, Ben Fritz wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:39:28 AM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought your sort could be done in Vim with 2 passes, but unfortunately
> >> it does not work:
> >>
> >> sort r /^\d\+
2014/06/26 01:07, Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:39:28 AM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote:
>>
>> I thought your sort could be done in Vim with 2 passes, but unfortunately it
>> does not work:
>>
>> sort r /^\d\+/
>> sort! /.*#/
>>
>
> Bram, any chance that a way to guarantee a stable
Hi Bram!
On Mi, 25 Jun 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > +/* pattern did not match in any line, skip sorting */
> > +if (skip_sort == eap->line2)
> > + goto sortend;
>
> I don't think this works when eap->line1 is not 1, sorting a range of
> lines.
Indeed. Here is the correct version.
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:39:28 AM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote:
>
> I thought your sort could be done in Vim with 2 passes, but unfortunately it
> does not work:
>
> sort r /^\d\+/
> sort! /.*#/
>
Bram, any chance that a way to guarantee a stable sort could be included, so
sorting by multiple f
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 05:52:10AM -0700, Axel Bender wrote:
> @Ben Fritz
>
> As I see it, you can use a search pattern (r) for certain tasks, but it isn't
> a solution. Please, consider the following sample:
>
> 19500623 # ÖST # USA # Curitiba
> 19500621 # ÖST # MEX # Macapa
> 19500825 # AND #
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Di, 24 Jun 2014, Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
> > On Di, 24 Jun 2014, Axel Bender wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know a UTF-8-aware (respecting $LC_ALL and/or $LANGUAGE) sort
> > > tool for Windows (GNUWin32's doesn't work), preferably a working GNU sort
> > > that
On Di, 24 Jun 2014, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Di, 24 Jun 2014, Axel Bender wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know a UTF-8-aware (respecting $LC_ALL and/or $LANGUAGE) sort
> > tool for Windows (GNUWin32's doesn't work), preferably a working GNU sort
> > that does the job? [OFF-TOPIC]
>
> Cygwin, Ms
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Di, 24 Jun 2014, Axel Bender wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know a UTF-8-aware (respecting $LC_ALL and/or $LANGUAGE) sort
>> tool for Windows (GNUWin32's doesn't work), preferably a working GNU sort
>> that does the job? [OFF-TOPIC]
>
> Cy
On Di, 24 Jun 2014, Axel Bender wrote:
> Does anyone know a UTF-8-aware (respecting $LC_ALL and/or $LANGUAGE) sort
> tool for Windows (GNUWin32's doesn't work), preferably a working GNU sort
> that does the job? [OFF-TOPIC]
Cygwin, Msys, Interix? Not sure, but not sure, which one does support
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 7:52:10 AM UTC-5, Axel Bender wrote:
> @Ben Fritz
>
>
>
> As I see it, you can use a search pattern (r) for certain tasks, but it isn't
> a solution. Please, consider the following sample:
>
>
>
> 19500623 # ÖST # USA # Curitiba
>
> 19500621 # ÖST # MEX # Macapa
>
@Ben Fritz
As I see it, you can use a search pattern (r) for certain tasks, but it isn't a
solution. Please, consider the following sample:
19500623 # ÖST # USA # Curitiba
19500621 # ÖST # MEX # Macapa
19500825 # AND # FRA # Curitiba
19500620 # MEX # BRA # Recife
19500625 # BEL # FRA # Curitiba
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:44:19 AM UTC-5, Axel Bender wrote:
> Does anyone know a UTF-8-aware (respecting $LC_ALL and/or $LANGUAGE) sort
> tool for Windows (GNUWin32's doesn't work), preferably a working GNU sort
> that does the job? [OFF-TOPIC]
>
> It would be a nice idea [NO LONGER OFF-TOPIC
Does anyone know a UTF-8-aware (respecting $LC_ALL and/or $LANGUAGE) sort tool
for Windows (GNUWin32's doesn't work), preferably a working GNU sort that does
the job? [OFF-TOPIC]
It would be a nice idea [NO LONGER OFF-TOPIC] to add the possibility to add
sort columns (like in GNU's --key=.) to
18 matches
Mail list logo
