2016-04-27 4:38 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar :
>
> Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote:
>
> > > > 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar :
> > > > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X.
> > > >
> > > > As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions
> isalpha(),
> > > > isalnu
Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote:
> > > 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar :
> > > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X.
> > >
> > > As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(),
> > > isalnum() and ispunct() of OS X accept a wider range of 8-bit char
2016-04-26 6:28 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar :
>
> Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote:
>
> > 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar :
> > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X.
> >
> > As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(),
> > isalnum() and ispunct() of O
Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote:
> 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar :
> > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X.
>
> As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(),
> isalnum() and ispunct() of OS X accept a wider range of 8-bit characters as
> class m
2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar :
> I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X.
As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(),
isalnum() and ispunct() of OS X accept a wider range of 8-bit characters as
class members. In other words, in contrast to
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X.
> Patch 1785 didn't fix this?
Something rings a bell about OS X being unusual in some way regarding
precomposition of unicode chars. I'm not an expert or even really a
beginner o
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Manuel Ortega wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Bram Moolenaar
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Patch 7.4.1783
> > > Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle char
Manuel Ortega wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> >
> > Patch 7.4.1783
> > Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle character classes
> > correctly.
> > (Manuel Ortega)
> > Solution: Use reg
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Patch 7.4.1783
> Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle character classes
> correctly.
> (Manuel Ortega)
> Solution: Use regmbc() instead of regc(). Add a test.
> Files:
Patch 7.4.1783
Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle character classes correctly.
(Manuel Ortega)
Solution: Use regmbc() instead of regc(). Add a test.
Files: src/regexp.c, src/testdir/test_regexp_utf8.vim
*** ../vim-7.4.1782/src/regexp.c2016-04-08
10 matches
Mail list logo