Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-26 Fir de Conversatie Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-04-27 4:38 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > > > > > 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > > > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X. > > > > > > > > As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions > isalpha(), > > > > isalnu

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-26 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > > > 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X. > > > > > > As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(), > > > isalnum() and ispunct() of OS X accept a wider range of 8-bit char

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-26 Fir de Conversatie Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-04-26 6:28 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > > > 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X. > > > > As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(), > > isalnum() and ispunct() of O

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-25 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > 2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X. > > As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(), > isalnum() and ispunct() of OS X accept a wider range of 8-bit characters as > class m

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-04-25 5:03 GMT+09:00 Bram Moolenaar : > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X. As the failure message above indicates, it looks the functions isalpha(), isalnum() and ispunct() of OS X accept a wider range of 8-bit characters as class members. In other words, in contrast to

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Manuel Ortega
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > I do not see a clue why this would be different on OS/X. > Patch 1785 didn't fix this? Something rings a bell about OS X being unusual in some way regarding precomposition of unicode chars. I'm not an expert or even really a beginner o

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Manuel Ortega
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Manuel Ortega wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Bram Moolenaar > wrote: > > > > > > > > Patch 7.4.1783 > > > Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle char

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Manuel Ortega wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > Patch 7.4.1783 > > Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle character classes > > correctly. > > (Manuel Ortega) > > Solution: Use reg

Re: Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Manuel Ortega
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Patch 7.4.1783 > Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle character classes > correctly. > (Manuel Ortega) > Solution: Use regmbc() instead of regc(). Add a test. > Files:

Patch 7.4.1783

2016-04-24 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.4.1783 Problem:The old regexp engine doesn't handle character classes correctly. (Manuel Ortega) Solution: Use regmbc() instead of regc(). Add a test. Files: src/regexp.c, src/testdir/test_regexp_utf8.vim *** ../vim-7.4.1782/src/regexp.c2016-04-08