Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 11:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> >> >> Or how could I reproduce this myself?
> >>
> >> Install pyclewn and run in the distribution directory:
> >
> > What is the distribution directory? I looked in
> > /usr/local/lib/python
On 06/06/2016 11:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>> >> Or how could I reproduce this myself?
>>
>> Install pyclewn and run in the distribution directory:
>
> What is the distribution directory? I looked in
> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/clewn
> but there is no setu
Ramel Eshed wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 12:14:25 AM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> >
> > > On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > >> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 12:14:25 AM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>
> > On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > >> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It
Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> >>
> >>> Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all
> 'insert'
> >>> function messages are matched with a r
On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>>
>>> Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert'
>>> function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch.
>>> This happens wit
I wrote:
> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>
> > Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert'
> > function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch.
> > This happens with a test that sends 50 'insert' of 353 b
Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert'
> function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch.
> This happens with a test that sends 50 'insert' of 353 bytes in a row
> interleaved with
Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert'
function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch.
This happens with a test that sends 50 'insert' of 353 bytes in a row
interleaved with about the same amount of 'remove
Patch 7.4.1891
Problem:Channel reading very long lines is slow.
Solution: Collapse multiple buffers until a NL is found.
Files: src/channel.c, src/netbeans.c, src/proto/channel.pro,
src/structs.h
*** ../vim-7.4.1890/src/channel.c 2016-06-02 20:05:22.480384217 +0200
10 matches
Mail list logo