Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-07 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Xavier de Gaye wrote: > On 06/06/2016 11:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Xavier de Gaye wrote: > >> >> Or how could I reproduce this myself? > >> > >> Install pyclewn and run in the distribution directory: > > > > What is the distribution directory? I looked in > > /usr/local/lib/python

Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-07 Fir de Conversatie Xavier de Gaye
On 06/06/2016 11:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Xavier de Gaye wrote: >> >> Or how could I reproduce this myself? >> >> Install pyclewn and run in the distribution directory: > > What is the distribution directory? I looked in > /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/clewn > but there is no setu

Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-07 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ramel Eshed wrote: > On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 12:14:25 AM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Xavier de Gaye wrote: > > > > > On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > >> Xavier de Gaye wrote: > > > >> > > > >>

Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-07 Fir de Conversatie Ramel Eshed
On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 12:14:25 AM UTC+3, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Xavier de Gaye wrote: > > > On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > >> Xavier de Gaye wrote: > > >> > > >>> Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It

Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-06 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Xavier de Gaye wrote: > On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > >> Xavier de Gaye wrote: > >> > >>> Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all > 'insert' > >>> function messages are matched with a r

Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-05 Fir de Conversatie Xavier de Gaye
On 06/05/2016 04:11 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: >> Xavier de Gaye wrote: >> >>> Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert' >>> function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch. >>> This happens wit

Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-05 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
I wrote: > Xavier de Gaye wrote: > > > Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert' > > function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch. > > This happens with a test that sends 50 'insert' of 353 b

Re: Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-05 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Xavier de Gaye wrote: > Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert' > function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch. > This happens with a test that sends 50 'insert' of 353 bytes in a row > interleaved with

Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-05 Fir de Conversatie Xavier de Gaye
Two pyclewn tests fail after patch 7.4.1891. It seems that not all 'insert' function messages are matched with a reply from Vim after this patch. This happens with a test that sends 50 'insert' of 353 bytes in a row interleaved with about the same amount of 'remove

Patch 7.4.1891

2016-06-04 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.4.1891 Problem:Channel reading very long lines is slow. Solution: Collapse multiple buffers until a NL is found. Files: src/channel.c, src/netbeans.c, src/proto/channel.pro, src/structs.h *** ../vim-7.4.1890/src/channel.c 2016-06-02 20:05:22.480384217 +0200