Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote:
> On my Mac, I've been unable to install vim due to a failure of test55
> coming with Patch 7.4.341.
>
> To be more specific, the failure is relevant to lines 335--336 of
> test55.in, and the comparison of test55.failed I got with test55.ok is
>
On 2014/06/26, at 15:40, Jun T. wrote:
> It would be possible to make vim's sort() function stable if we save the
> original
> order in a separate array and ...
No, I was wrong; saving in a separate array won't work; the original order
should
be saved in the same array, as in the following *ex
On 2014/06/26, at 15:08, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote:
> On my Mac, I've been unable to install vim due to a failure of test55 coming
> with Patch 7.4.341.
Yes, I've noticed the same error and just been writing a bug report when
I received your post.
> But... It looks the M
Hi,
On my Mac, I've been unable to install vim due to a failure of test55 coming
with Patch 7.4.341.
To be more specific, the failure is relevant to lines 335--336 of test55.in,
and the comparison of test55.failed I got with test55.ok is
$ diff test55.failed test55.ok
104c104
Patch 7.4.341
Problem:sort() doesn't handle numbers well.
Solution: Add an argument to specify sorting on numbers. (Christian Brabandt)
Files: runtime/doc/eval.txt, src/eval.c, src/testdir/test55.in,
src/testdir/test55.ok
*** ../vim-7.4.340/runtime/doc/eval.txt 2014-
