Jan Pobrislo wrote:
Glib inside gvim, since gtk+ uses glib internally. More precisely glib is
that part of gtk+ that does not deal with gui, so there's no gvim without
glib. (Unless there's implementation of gvim not based on gtk which I'm
unaware of).
A gvim can be compiled using motif under L
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:40:20AM +0200, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> On 12/05/13 21:28, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
> >Glib inside gvim, since gtk+ uses glib internally. More precisely glib is
> >that part of gtk+ that does not deal with gui, so there's no gvim without
> >glib. (Unless there's implementation
On 12/05/13 21:28, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
On Sat, 11 May 2013 04:45:50 +0200, Tony Mechelynck
wrote:
1) Add VimL api to hook into the eventloops. The unix poll() eventloop seems
simple enough to start with.
Is it guaranteed to be available? Think MS-Windows or IBM-mainframe.
Nope, neith
On Sat, 11 May 2013 15:44:10 +0200, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> An alternative would be to allow any python thread to call the vim-python
> interface through message passing.
That indeed is also possible, but for it to work properly you need to create
interface for waking the main thread from iowait,
On Sat, 11 May 2013 04:45:50 +0200, Tony Mechelynck
wrote:
> > 1) Add VimL api to hook into the eventloops. The unix poll() eventloop seems
> > simple enough to start with.
>
> Is it guaranteed to be available? Think MS-Windows or IBM-mainframe.
>
Nope, neither are some other optional feat
Hi vimmers!
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Tony Mechelynck
wrote:
> On 10/05/13 10:54, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 09 May 2013 05:51:48 +0200, Bram Moolenaar
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The top five of the voting list:
>>> http://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
>>>
>>> 1. add IDE features
>>
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
>
> I'm quite curious what is meant by IDE-like features. From my experience
> most of that is covered by plugins already, except for one significant
> roadblock: inability to communicate with external processes without blocking
> whole UI. Ther
On 10/05/13 10:54, Jan Pobrislo wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 05:51:48 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The top five of the voting list:
http://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
1. add IDE features
2. add integration with Python instead of inventing more Vim script
3. fix all problems, big and sma
On Thu, 09 May 2013 05:51:48 +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> The top five of the voting list:
> http://www.vim.org/sponsor/vote_results.php
>
> 1. add IDE features
> 2. add integration with Python instead of inventing more Vim script
> 3. fix all problems, big and small; make Vim more robust
> 4.