On 26 August 2012 10:14, John Beckett wrote:
> Vim is written and managed by Bram Moolenaar (with many other
> excellent contributions). Björn Winckler manages MacVim. Anyone
> can create a patch to add a feature, but for that feature to be
> accepted into the main distribution, there would need t
Andy Wokula wrote:
> If it's just about the size of the LineNr font, you can have
> it changed:
> :hi LineNr font=XXX
>
> where XXX is a 'guifont' argument,
> :set gfn?
Amazing! That works, although in a quick test it appears that
the line number characters occupy the same width and heig
Am 25.08.2012 13:49, schrieb Hans Tovetjärn:
Hi!
I've been using a few GUI versions of Vim and most of them seem to
simply act as a wrapper while everything else remain the same. If one
already uses Vim one is probably familiar enough with the various
keybindings and commands to make navigating
Hans Tovetjärn wrote:
> My knowledge is rather limited when it comes to C so it's
> difficult for me to estimate how much effort introducing
> something like this would take (which is part of the reason
> for me asking - curiosity).
As Ingo mentioned, any GUI feature is likely to be resisted
becau
On Saturday den 25 August 2012 at 20.24, Ingo Karkat wrote:
> Your proposal sounds innocent enough: Let's make all of this optional, so
> people
> can opt out of it. But please consider that this makes everything costlier:
> more
> configuration, more code = more interactions = more bugs, more te
On 25-Aug-2012 13:49:15 +0200, Hans Tovetjärn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been using a few GUI versions of Vim and most of them seem to
> simply act as a wrapper while everything else remain the same. If one
> already uses Vim one is probably familiar enough with the various
> keybindings and commands
Hi!
I've been using a few GUI versions of Vim and most of them seem to simply act
as a wrapper while everything else remain the same. If one already uses Vim one
is probably familiar enough with the various keybindings and commands to make
navigating menus with a mouse somewhat redundant.
Wo
