Hi Bram,
> It was there intentionally. Does it cause a problem anywhere?
Oh, not at all. But it seemed inconsistent because ":h +feature-list"
lists the feature as "+fork", but :version shows "+fork()".
That could mislead people to use code like "has('fork()')".
--
--
You received this mess
Marco Hinz wrote:
> I just noticed a little glitch when I looked at :version
>
> --- a/src/version.c Thu May 30 22:44:02 2013 +0200
> +++ b/src/version.c Fri May 31 17:19:56 2013 +0200
> @@ -250,1 +250,1 @@
> - "+fork()",
> + "+fork",
>
It was there intentionally. Does it cause a
Hey,
I just noticed a little glitch when I looked at :version
--- a/src/version.c Thu May 30 22:44:02 2013 +0200
+++ b/src/version.c Fri May 31 17:19:56 2013 +0200
@@ -250,1 +250,1 @@
- "+fork()",
+ "+fork",
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do no
