Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > You move the code to connect for different GUI versions to another
> > place, away from the disconnect code. I don't see a reason for this.
> > Why not keep it as it was?
> >
>
>
> Hi Bram,
>
> netbeans_sta
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> You move the code to connect for different GUI versions to another
> place, away from the disconnect code. I don't see a reason for this.
> Why not keep it as it was?
>
Hi Bram,
netbeans_startup_done() has been split in two parts:
* net
Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> I have setup a Mercurial Queues patch at
> http://pyclewn.sourceforge.net/vim-patches.html
> It will be easier to test this patch and pyclewn 1.1 can now run with
> Vim in a console.
>
> The major change from the patch I sent last April, is that netbeans
> version has bee
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>
> I have setup a Mercurial Queues patch at
> http://pyclewn.sourceforge.net/vim-patches.html
> It will be easier to test this patch and pyclewn 1.1 can now run with
> Vim in a console.
>
The documentation at
http://pyclewn.sourceforge.net/v
Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> >> > ...
> >> >>> BTW do you think an implementation of netbeans over Vim console is
> >> >>> acceptable as a Vim patch (as opposed to an external patch such as
> >> >>> those in http://groups.google.com/group/vim_
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>> > ...
>> >>> BTW do you think an implementation of netbeans over Vim console is
>> >>> acceptable as a Vim patch (as opposed to an external patch such as
>
Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> > ...
> >>> BTW do you think an implementation of netbeans over Vim console is
> >>> acceptable as a Vim patch (as opposed to an external patch such as
> >>> those in http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/web/vim-pa
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> ...
>>> BTW do you think an implementation of netbeans over Vim console is
>>> acceptable as a Vim patch (as opposed to an external patch such as
>>> those in http://groups.google.com/group/vim_dev/web/vim-patches).
>>
>> If you can make the n
On 09/11/08 21:45, sc wrote:
> On Sunday 09 November 2008 1:18 pm, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> [snip]
>> There was an error in patch 7.2.027 (corrected in 7.2.030 and improved
>> in 7.2.031) which caused compile errors. If you upgrade to the current
>> source it ought to work.
>
> for whatever reason
On Sunday 09 November 2008 1:18 pm, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
[snip]
> There was an error in patch 7.2.027 (corrected in 7.2.030 and improved
> in 7.2.031) which caused compile errors. If you upgrade to the current
> source it ought to work.
for whatever reason, svn is lagging behind posted patche
On 09/11/08 11:38, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:14 PM, sc<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Saturday 08 November 2008 10:12 am, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Bram Moolenaar<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>> The place where you invoke mch_ex
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 7:14 PM, sc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 08 November 2008 10:12 am, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > ...
>> >> > The place where you invoke mch_exit() looks a bit weird. Not sure if
>> >
On Saturday 08 November 2008 10:12 am, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > ...
> >> > The place where you invoke mch_exit() looks a bit weird. Not sure if
> >> > this is the best solution. And when compiled without GUI (e.g.,
>
On Saturday 08 November 2008 10:12 am, Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > ...
> >> > The place where you invoke mch_exit() looks a bit weird. Not sure if
> >> > this is the best solution. And when compiled without GUI (e.g.,
>
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > ...
>> > The place where you invoke mch_exit() looks a bit weird. Not sure if
>> > this is the best solution. And when compiled without GUI (e.g.,
>> > starting a small version of Vim) this exit won't be reached. Woul
Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> >> When an application forks a Vim that is not compiled with the
> >> netbeans_intg feature, the application waits for Vim to establish the
> >> socket connection and Vim silently ignores the "-nb" command line
> >> argument. It is difficult for the user to understand wha
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Xavier de Gaye wrote:
>
>> When an application forks a Vim that is not compiled with the
>> netbeans_intg feature, the application waits for Vim to establish the
>> socket connection and Vim silently ignores the "-nb" co
Xavier de Gaye wrote:
> When an application forks a Vim that is not compiled with the
> netbeans_intg feature, the application waits for Vim to establish the
> socket connection and Vim silently ignores the "-nb" command line
> argument. It is difficult for the user to understand what is wrong.
When an application forks a Vim that is not compiled with the
netbeans_intg feature, the application waits for Vim to establish the
socket connection and Vim silently ignores the "-nb" command line
argument. It is difficult for the user to understand what is wrong.
The attached patch causes Vim to
19 matches
Mail list logo
