On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, David Pope wrote:
> 1. Build vim in the src directory with 'nmake -f Make_mvc.mak FEATURES=HUGE
> MBYTE=yes'
> 2. Run tests in the testdir directory with 'nmake -f Make_dos.mak clean',
> followed by 'nmake -f Make_dos.mak'.
>
> Nazri, can you check that those three
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> David Pope wrote:
> Separately, in order to get three of the tests to complete, I had to change
> > the following line in Make_dos.mak:
> >
> > fixff:
> > -$(VIMPROG) -u dos.vim --noplugin "+argdo set ff=dos|upd" +q *.in
> > *.ok
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:36 PM, David Pope wrote:
> These three tests output in ff=unix, either explicitly (test 60) or
> implicitly (tests 71, 74), so the diff fails. Do they run without
> modifications for you?
Initially I ran "nmake -f Make_mvc.mak test" in the src directory
and only test50 f
David Pope wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Nazri Ramliy wrote:
> >
> > The doc is (just a teeny bit) inaccurate.
> >
> > I'm the one who wrote that note, and also the one who submitted the
> > patch for the :find, :sfind and :tabfind completion, bugs and all :)
> >
> > For completion, t
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 2:31 AM, Nazri Ramliy wrote:
>
> The doc is (just a teeny bit) inaccurate.
>
> I'm the one who wrote that note, and also the one who submitted the
> patch for the :find, :sfind and :tabfind completion, bugs and all :)
>
> For completion, the "/**" path specification is suppo
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> David Pope wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to get the tests to run cleanly (host and target:
> Windows
> > 7 x64), but I'm not having much luck with some of them. Are they
> > up-to-date and expected to run cleanly?
>
> On Linux they do. S
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:04 AM, David Pope wrote:
> It's not working right. When troubleshooting I found this note at the end
> of editing.txt:
>
> Note that completion for ":find", ":sfind", and ":tabfind" commands do
> not
> currently work with 'path' items that contain a url or use the
David Pope wrote:
> I've been trying to get the tests to run cleanly (host and target: Windows
> 7 x64), but I'm not having much luck with some of them. Are they
> up-to-date and expected to run cleanly?
On Linux they do. Some tests may not work on Windows. Some may not
work when some externa
I've been trying to get the tests to run cleanly (host and target: Windows
7 x64), but I'm not having much luck with some of them. Are they
up-to-date and expected to run cleanly?
I've been assuming that any issues I'm finding are due to my own
environment, of course. But test 73, for example, i
