Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-12 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: On Mo, 11 Jul 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Thanks for the fix. Can you also update the test so that it fails without this patch? Sure. Thanks! -- There is a fine line between courage and foolishness. Unfortunately, it's not a fence. /// Bram Moolenaar --

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-11 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: On Sa, 09 Jul 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Bill Bee beeyawned wrote: These have a problem with f and F Mac gui vim-app 7.3.237 Mac terminal vim 7.3.237 WinXP gui vim 7.3.237 If there are consecutive characters as , using f to find the

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-11 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Bram! On Mo, 11 Jul 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Thanks for the fix. Can you also update the test so that it fails without this patch? Sure. regards, Christian -- -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-10 Fir de Conversatie Bee
On Jul 9, 1:04 pm, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote: A temporary work around would be: :set cpo+=; I looked at :help 'cpo' but could not find the ; option. In the older vim 6.2 the option causes an error: E539: Illegal character ;: cpo+=; How does your temporary work around work? I

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-10 Fir de Conversatie ZyX
Reply to message «Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails», sent 21:31:33 10 July 2011, Sunday by Bee: See the description of patch #235: Problem:; gets stuck on a t command, it's not useful. Solution: Add the ';' flag in 'cpo'. (Christian Brabandt) . I guess it is a patch that broke `;' movement

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-09 Fir de Conversatie Tony Mechelynck
On 09/07/11 06:06, Bee wrote: These have a problem with f and F Mac gui vim-app 7.3.237 Mac terminal vim 7.3.237 WinXP gui vim 7.3.237 If there are consecutive characters as , using f to find the next 4 will skip to every other 4 or in the case of 44 with no other 4's in the line, will not

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-09 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Bill Bee beeyawned wrote: These have a problem with f and F Mac gui vim-app 7.3.237 Mac terminal vim 7.3.237 WinXP gui vim 7.3.237 If there are consecutive characters as , using f to find the next 4 will skip to every other 4 or in the case of 44 with no other 4's in the line, will

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-09 Fir de Conversatie Bee
On Jul 9, 3:34 am, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: Bill Bee beeyawned wrote: These have a problem with f and F Mac gui vim-app 7.3.237 Mac terminal vim 7.3.237 WinXP gui vim 7.3.237 If there are consecutive characters as , using f to find the next 4 will skip to every

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-09 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Bram! On Sa, 09 Jul 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Bill Bee beeyawned wrote: These have a problem with f and F Mac gui vim-app 7.3.237 Mac terminal vim 7.3.237 WinXP gui vim 7.3.237 If there are consecutive characters as , using f to find the next 4 will skip to every

Re: vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-09 Fir de Conversatie Bee
On Jul 9, 1:04 pm, Christian Brabandt cbli...@256bit.org wrote: A temporary work around would be: :set cpo+=; Thank you Christian, the temporary work around... works. -Bill -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying

vim 7.3.237 f fails

2011-07-08 Fir de Conversatie Bee
These have a problem with f and F Mac gui vim-app 7.3.237 Mac terminal vim 7.3.237 WinXP gui vim 7.3.237 If there are consecutive characters as , using f to find the next 4 will skip to every other 4 or in the case of 44 with no other 4's in the line, will not progress to the next 4. These