On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:13:44PM +0200, björn wrote:
> OK, I've restored the src/configure script from upstream now.
Tested and works.
Thanks again.
-gmn
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_mac" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For mor
On Jun 23, 2013, at 1:56 PM, gmn wrote:
> I would certainly have done so, but not being a programmer, I didn't
> know that that is in fact the correct solution. For all I knew, there
> may have been a very good reason for there to be two different, meaty
> configure scripts.
>
> Therefore I tri
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:13:44PM +0200, björn wrote:
> OK, I've restored the src/configure script from upstream now.
Will test forthwith.
BTW, you don't sound ungrateful :)
> In this case, if you had kept it to one post which simply said
> "replace src/configure with the one from upstream" it
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:10 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:02:59PM +0200, björn wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:46 AM, wrote:
>> > Could it be because MacVim has TWO 'configure' files of substance, while
>> > BramVim only has one?
>> >
>> > In MacVim repo:
>> > 'configure' is just
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:02:59PM +0200, björn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:46 AM, wrote:
> > Could it be because MacVim has TWO 'configure' files of substance, while
> > BramVim only has one?
> >
> > In MacVim repo:
> > 'configure' is just a tiny wrapper.
> > 'src/configure' is "meaty".
>
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:02:59PM +0200, björn wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:46 AM, wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:27:17PM +0200, björn wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:10:58PM -0400, wrote:
> >> >> On 05/27/13 at 10:46:11 -0400 g
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:46 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:27:17PM +0200, björn wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:10:58PM -0400, wrote:
>> >> On 05/27/13 at 10:46:11 -0400 gmn wrote:
>> >> > In my opinion, whatever scripts in MacVim that
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:27:17PM +0200, björn wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:10:58PM -0400, wrote:
> >> On 05/27/13 at 10:46:11 -0400 gmn wrote:
> >> > In my opinion, whatever scripts in MacVim that control this ought to
> >> > be changed so that
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:27:17PM +0200, björn wrote:
> I think it would be better to figure out why there is a difference
> instead of blindly patching. I don't know what causes it though, so I
> can't help.
Very well then :)
To all: don't use the '-C' flag with './configure', or else you will
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:55 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:10:58PM -0400, wrote:
>> On 05/27/13 at 10:46:11 -0400 gmn wrote:
>> > In my opinion, whatever scripts in MacVim that control this ought to
>> > be changed so that the result matches BramVim, and config.cache
>> > files will go i
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:10:58PM -0400, dv1...@wayne.edu wrote:
> On 05/27/13 at 10:46:11 -0400 gmn wrote:
> > In my opinion, whatever scripts in MacVim that control this ought to
> > be changed so that the result matches BramVim, and config.cache
> > files will go in src/auto rather than just sr
Two things, for the record,
1. To prevent any confusion with my other ongoing thread re Tiger PPC, I note
that this business about config.cache happens on all archs. I see it on Tiger
PPC, Leopard PPC, Lion and Mountain Lion.
2. Also, besides config.cache, the following files are put into "src
On 05/27/13 at 10:46:11 -0400 gmn wrote:
> In my opinion, whatever scripts in MacVim that control this ought to be
> changed so that the result matches BramVim, and config.cache files will
> go in src/auto rather than just src. That way, "make distclean" in a
> MacVim repo will in fact clean them.
(Bram, you'll probably be interested in this thread still)
björn, on 05/24/13 at 15:39:41 +0200, wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:16 PM, wrote:
> > Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > > Doing 'make distclean' doesn't remove src/config.cache.
> > > > Shouldn't it? I went to compare this to the BramVi
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:16 PM, wrote:
> Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > > Doing 'make distclean' doesn't remove src/config.cache. Shouldn't it?
> > > I went to compare this to the BramVim repo, but found that the BramVim
> > > repo's ./configure script never even creates src/config.cache in th
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Doing 'make distclean' doesn't remove src/config.cache. Shouldn't it?
> > I went to compare this to the BramVim repo, but found that the BramVim
> > repo's ./configure script never even creates src/config.cache in the
> > first place.
> >
> > If I forget to do the "e
> Doing 'make distclean' doesn't remove src/config.cache. Shouldn't it?
> I went to compare this to the BramVim repo, but found that the BramVim
> repo's ./configure script never even creates src/config.cache in the
> first place.
>
> If I forget to do the "export CC=clang" bit before ./configu
Hi Björn,
Doing 'make distclean' doesn't remove src/config.cache. Shouldn't it?
I went to compare this to the BramVim repo, but found that the BramVim
repo's ./configure script never even creates src/config.cache in the
first place.
If I forget to do the "export CC=clang" bit before ./configuri
18 matches
Mail list logo
