Re: Vim Patch broke pathogen?

2018-06-17 Thread fREW Schmidt
Thanks for the follow up. -- Sent from a rotary phone rented from Ma Bell -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this

Re: Vim Patch broke pathogen?

2018-06-14 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 11:50:17 AM UTC-7, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > So Vim seems to choke on the line > > let blacklist = > \ get(g:, 'pathogen_blacklist', get(g:, 'pathogen_disabled', [])) + > \ pathogen#split($VIMBLACKLIST) > > Maybe $VIMBLACKLIST is undefined? Or

Re: Vim Patch broke pathogen?

2018-06-14 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 11:34:48 AM UTC-7, Christian Brabandt wrote: > On Do, 14 Jun 2018, Frew Schmidt wrote: > > > I use pathogen as my plugin manager and updated vim yesterday > > You know, that you don't need pathogen anymore since Vim 8? I am aware, but the vast m

Re: Vim Patch broke pathogen?

2018-06-14 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 8:49:44 AM UTC-7, Tony Mechelynck wrote: > 1. Which featureset? That can be found from one of the next few lines > in the :version output after the two you quoted; the line which ends > with "Features included (+) or not (-)". What does that line say > before that?

Vim Patch broke pathogen?

2018-06-14 Thread Frew Schmidt
I use pathogen as my plugin manager and updated vim yesterday (via a PPA that is updated two or three times a week.) When I start vim I now get this error: Error detected while processing function pathogen#infect[8]..pathogen#interpose[12]..pathogen#is_disabled: line5: E15: Invalid

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-25 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:14:06AM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote: > So perhaps we need a similar change here as well. Can you provide a > reproducible example for the :cexpr case please)? Sure; same setup as before, and in vim: :cexpr system('ls * \| xargs -n1 -I{} echo {}:1:{}') --

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-24 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:08:58PM +, Antony Scriven wrote: > On May 24, Frew Schmidt wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Maybe a dumb question, but why would BufNew be more expensive > > than BufRead? Shouldn't the filetype stuff get run either way? > > I w

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-24 Thread Frew Schmidt
I'm glad you were able to come up with a solution! So I guess `vim *` goes through a different codepath than `:args *`? Note that this also affects the quickfix, the location list, and the local args list. Initially I discovered this issue with `:cexpr` and reproduced it with `:lexpr` and

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-24 Thread fREW Schmidt
ay 24, 2017 12:52 PM, "Christian Brabandt" <cbli...@256bit.org> wrote: > > On Mi, 24 Mai 2017, fREW Schmidt wrote: > > > It is sorta weird that the vb syntax, is somehow part of the problem, > > but whatever I understand that this was the wrong way to configure

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-24 Thread fREW Schmidt
s only triggered for the first > one that's actually edited. FWIW 'BufNew' is not in the template > ftdetect file in the docs. --Antony > > On 23 May 2017 at 22:28, Frew Schmidt <fri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 12:58:16 PM UTC-7, Bram Moolenaar wrote: &g

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-24 Thread fREW Schmidt
; file in the args list, whereas BufRead is only triggered for the first > one that's actually edited. FWIW 'BufNew' is not in the template > ftdetect file in the docs. --Antony > > On 23 May 2017 at 22:28, Frew Schmidt <fri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 12:

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-23 Thread Frew Schmidt
ave multiple workarounds at this point. Thanks, fREW Schmidt -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message beca

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-23 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 9:40:02 AM UTC-7, Frew Schmidt wrote: > On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 9:16:45 AM UTC-7, Frew Schmidt wrote: > > > Perhaps you can get some more information by setting 'verbose' to a > > > > > > non-zero number, e.g. ten. > > > &

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-23 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 9:16:45 AM UTC-7, Frew Schmidt wrote: > > Perhaps you can get some more information by setting 'verbose' to a > > > > non-zero number, e.g. ten. > > > Well, I ran it with -V10 and even after deleting both ~/.vim/ (except for the > ftd

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-23 Thread Frew Schmidt
> Perhaps you can get some more information by setting 'verbose' to a > > non-zero number, e.g. ten. Well, I ran it with -V10 and even after deleting both ~/.vim/ (except for the ftdetect file) and ~/.vimrc and I can still reproduce it. It looks about the same as before: the markdown support

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-23 Thread fREW Schmidt
1:52 AM, "Bram Moolenaar" <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote: > > Frew Schmidt wrote: > > > I recently discovered that using ftdetect is absurdly slower than > filetype.vim. To reproduce, try this: > > > > mkdir -p ~/.vim/ftdetect > > echo 'au

Re: Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-22 Thread Frew Schmidt
FYI I reproduced this with a recent checkout and also a 7.3 build, so I'm pretty sure it's neither fixed nor a regression. I will look into profiling the issue, but I am still baffled. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the

Bug in ftdetect?

2017-05-22 Thread Frew Schmidt
I recently discovered that using ftdetect is absurdly slower than filetype.vim. To reproduce, try this: mkdir -p ~/.vim/ftdetect echo 'autocmd BufNew,BufNewFile,BufRead *.md :set filetype=markdown' > ~/.vim/ftdetect/markdown.vim mkdir testing cd testing touch

Some fonts absurdly slow down gvim

2017-05-12 Thread Frew Schmidt
I'm using gvim, as I have for many years, for long-lived editing sessions. I recently upgraded to ubuntu 17.04 which brought along an upgrade to Vim 8.0. I have noticed that gvim gets slower and slower with use, and it doesn't seem to require very much use for it to be, in my opinion, unusably

Re: SIGBUS in Vim 7.4

2016-05-12 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 12:17:03 PM UTC-7, Dominique Pelle wrote: > Frew Schmidt <fri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 2:18:31 AM UTC-7, Dominique Pelle wrote: > >> [ ... ] > >> Thanks. I should add: asan writes errors (if any)

Re: SIGBUS in Vim 7.4

2016-05-11 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 2:18:31 AM UTC-7, Dominique Pelle wrote: > [ ... ] > Thanks. I should add: asan writes errors (if any) on stderr by default, > and since vim puts the terminal in cooked mode, asan error can be > garbled. So it's best to redirect stderr. The ASAN_OPTIONS >

Re: SIGBUS in Vim 7.4

2016-05-11 Thread Frew Schmidt
On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 11:03:45 PM UTC-7, Dominique Pelle wrote: > Frew Schmidt wrote: > > > Ok, so I built and installed a fresh vim according to > > Dominique's instructions and attempted both asan and valgrind. > > Either those things don't work together

Re: SIGBUS in Vim 7.4

2016-05-10 Thread Frew Schmidt
Ok, so I built and installed a fresh vim according to Dominique's instructions and attempted both asan and valgrind. Either those things don't work together, or I can repro the bug immediately. Here's the error: ==140331==Shadow memory range interleaves with an existing memory mapping. ASan

Re: SIGBUS in Vim 7.4

2016-05-10 Thread Frew Schmidt
Thanks all for the replies. I will try Dominique's method of building a new vim. Note that this issue is *very* rare, maybe happens every few weeks, so I do not expect it to happen again quickly, nor do I expect to run vim under valgrind constantly. For those who might be interested, my

SIGBUS in Vim 7.4

2016-05-10 Thread fREW Schmidt
any, many plugins stop working, I expect that I won't be able to keep going on with it. I am happy to run gdb commands on the coredump, but I cannot send it as I was editing work code at the time, and besides it's 125 megs. Let me know how to proceed. -- fREW Schmidt https://blog.afoolishman

automatic tabs for []?

2009-04-17 Thread fREW Schmidt
I love vim's autoindent, but for some reason it doesn't indent when I type [. Is there a way to set that up? -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_use maillist. For more information, visit

per filetype error match

2009-04-17 Thread fREW Schmidt
around for perl. Is there any way I can have this only exist for javascript? I tried putting syn match Error ..., but that didn't work. Any ideas? -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_use

Re: automatic tabs for []?

2009-04-17 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:50 PM, fREW Schmidt fri...@gmail.com wrote: I love vim's autoindent, but for some reason it doesn't indent when I type [. Is there a way to set that up? I've attached perl and javascript indent files with support for [ on indent. -- fREW Schmidt http

mega tabs! Is it possible?

2009-04-12 Thread fREW Schmidt
. Does anyone know a way to make it work like it's reading my mind? Thanks either way! -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_use maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-07 Thread fREW Schmidt
I'll do it with a mapping, but hopefully I won't have to do that forever and I'd like to do this the real vim way. Thanks again for your help Tony! I'll make mappings now. -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-07 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:35 AM, fREW Schmidt fri...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe this will give some insight: doing @; gives errors about an invalid register ';' but doing @: is (apparently) a no-op. Sounds like a bug. : should be a register too

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-06 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 22:32:56 -0500, fREW Schmidt wrote: On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/04/09 03:51, Ken Bloom wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:04:36 -0500

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-05 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:08 AM, Tony Mechelynck antoine.mechely...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/04/09 03:51, Ken Bloom wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:04:36 -0500, fREW Schmidt wrote: [...] Maybe this will give some insight: doing @; gives errors about an invalid register ';' but doing

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-04 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ken Bloom kbl...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 16:04:36 -0500, fREW Schmidt wrote: Ok, I figured out what the problem is, but it's a drag because I like the setting to much to not use it: Swap ; and : Convenient. nnoremap ; : nnoremap

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-03 Thread fREW Schmidt
@; nothing happens at all... -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_use maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-03 Thread fREW Schmidt
Tony. Maybe this will give some insight: doing @; gives errors about an invalid register ';' but doing @: is (apparently) a no-op. -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_use maillist

Why won't @: work?

2009-04-01 Thread fREW Schmidt
Ok, so I want to repeat a previous :command. Someone in the IRC channel told me to use @:, which makes sense. When I *did* try to do @: nothing happened. I checked to make sure that what I presumed was in : was (:p) and it was. Why would this command not work? -- fREW Schmidt http

Re: Why won't @: work?

2009-04-01 Thread fREW Schmidt
? Because I can... Could it be something weird with my vim configuration? I use @foo all the time for regular macros... -- fREW Schmidt http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message from the vim_use maillist. For more information, visit

Re: offtopic - readability in programing fonts

2009-01-27 Thread fREW Schmidt
what fonts do you think are better for long hour sessions? I use terminus in linux and consolas in windows, both around 8 or 10 in size. And I love the InkPot colorscheme. It's not too dark or light. -- -fREW http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com

How do I open a windows share from within vim?

2009-01-26 Thread fREW Schmidt
I am trying to write a function that will open a few windows for me, and one of them is on a different machine via windows share (I am currently on windows.) Is there any way to do this w/o mapping a new drive? -- -fREW http://blog.afoolishmanifesto.com

Re: How do I open a windows share from within vim?

2009-01-26 Thread fREW Schmidt
On 2009-01-26, fREW Schmidt fri...@gmail.com wrote: I am trying to write a function that will open a few windows for me, and one of them is on a different machine via windows share (I am currently on windows.) Is there any way to do this w/o mapping a new drive? This works for me

Re: command to paste into ex

2008-11-20 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At some point I knew a command that you could use to paste visually selected text (or something along those lines) into the ex command box. I couldn't find it in the docs but I presume I didn't know where to look. Any

Re: command to paste into ex

2008-11-20 Thread fREW Schmidt
On 2008-11-20, fREW Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At some point I knew a command that you could use to paste visually selected text (or something along those lines) into the ex command box. I couldn't

perl syntax folding

2008-11-05 Thread fREW Schmidt
So one of my coworkers just got mad at me for polluting a bunch of source code with fold markers, so I figured I should investigate syntax based folding. The folding that comes out of the box for perl is mostly great. Anyway, I want to fold on anonymous subroutines as well as regular subs. For

Re: GVim slow on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-05 Thread fREW Schmidt
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:31 AM, François Ingelrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Anyone else using the latest Ubuntu 8.10? I've installed it this week-end, and compiled the latest Vim as well (7.2.25). I've been using Vim all the day, and the GUI version is quite slow. Well, it's