Re: List of hotkeys?

2011-05-21 Thread Michael Hauser
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:18, Antonio Recio wrote: > It is possible to write to file the info of :verbose nmap? > :redir! > ~/nmap.txt :verbose nmap :redir END Best Regards, mih -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are

Re: Unable to enter functions keys in .vimrc or any other file

2011-05-02 Thread Michael Hauser
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 22:59, Mahendra Ladhe wrote: >    I am using vim 7.3 on Windows XP. I'm trying to map some function keys > using 'map' > command in the .vimrc > When I enter the key sequence ctrl-v followed by some function key, say F1, > vim enters the 4-character sequence instead of the

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-28 Thread Michael Hauser
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 19:54, Ben Schmidt wrote: > Sorry for so many mails in quick succession! > >> :verbose set background? > > Yep; looking at the source code, it looks like the 'background' and > 't_Co' options are to blame. > > And it looks like 'background' in this case must come from $COLO

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-28 Thread Michael Hauser
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 19:21, Ben Schmidt wrote: >>> I've redircted the output of ':verbose hi' along with the outputs of >>> 'set' for both user and root earlier, and posted them in this thread, >>> and they do differ. >> >> Yes; I glanced at that earlier. I didn't realise :verbose had been >> i

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-28 Thread Michael Hauser
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 19:12, Ben Schmidt wrote: >>> - Are you using a colour scheme? >> >> Woudn't this be set in '.vimrc'? > > Yes. It would be in some startup file if you were using one. I guess > :verbose hi would also show it up. > >>> - Does >>>  :verbose hi >>>  give any insight? I.e. are

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-28 Thread Michael Hauser
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 18:12, Ben Schmidt wrote: > It is running the correct vim binary, isn't it? I.e. /usr/local/bin is > in your $PATH before /usr/bin? I think that's where ./configure will put > it without --prefix being given. True. 'which vim' gives '/usr/local/bin' for both user and root.

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-28 Thread Michael Hauser
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:40, Michael Hauser wrote: -8<-8<- > I'm gonna build my own 'vim' from source, without any 'gnome' stuff, > and see what happens... tar xvjf vim-7.3.tar.bz2 cd vim73 ./configure;make;sudo make install rehash vim ~/.vimr

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-28 Thread Michael Hauser
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 06:29, Tony Mechelynck wrote: -8<-8<- > So: are you sure you are using the same version of Vim in both cases? > > what is the output to > >        which vim [~] ls -l `which vim` [12:26:30] [0] lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Nov 9 02:44 /usr/bin/vim

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-25 Thread Michael Hauser
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 16:16, Andrew Long wrote: >>> > Just a guess... at my site, we are mandated to have screen colours 'jump out' > at you when you're logging into a production system; it's to make you think > twice before doing something irrevocable. Not in this case, it used to work as

Re: syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-25 Thread Michael Hauser
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 15:36, Taylor Hedberg wrote: > I've seen the same thing happen with Vim and urxvt on my system. While I > never quite figured out what caused it, one way to work around it is to > just disable bold text in urxvt across the board. You can do that by > setting the terminal's

syntax highlighting colors bold text

2011-04-25 Thread Michael Hauser
Hi I've a user and root account on my system. The .vimrc file is identical. Using urxvt/screen, when I open e.g.: /home/mih/$ vim .zshrc as normal user all colored (syntax highlighted) text is rendered in bold style, which is ugly. When I sudo: /home/mih/$ sudo vim .zshrc everything looks as