On 27/05/09 16:42, Ben Fritz wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 27, 1:45 am, Markus Heidelberg
> wrote:
>> I didn't mean the built-in interpreter of cmd.exe when I talked about
>> shell, but sh.exe or bash.exe or something.
>>
>
> Sorry, my mistake. Somehow I missed the part where we were talking
> about cygwi
On May 27, 1:45 am, Markus Heidelberg
wrote:
> I didn't mean the built-in interpreter of cmd.exe when I talked about
> shell, but sh.exe or bash.exe or something.
>
Sorry, my mistake. Somehow I missed the part where we were talking
about cygwin in this thread. I tend to assume that "shell" in
Ben Fritz, 27.05.2009:
>
> On May 22, 12:24 pm, Markus Heidelberg
> wrote:
> > Ben Fritz, 22.05.2009:
> > > Why bypass the .bat wrappers?
> >
> > To make vimdiff work when invoked in a shell.
> >
> > > I've never seen any problems with them.
> >
> > I
> > have:http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.g
On May 22, 12:24 pm, Markus Heidelberg
wrote:
> Ben Fritz, 22.05.2009:
> > Why bypass the .bat wrappers?
>
> To make vimdiff work when invoked in a shell.
>
> > I've never seen any problems with them.
>
> I
> have:http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=commitdiff;h=bad42732008cb0c1e...
>
vimd
Ben Fritz, 22.05.2009:
>
> On May 21, 5:42 am, Tony Mechelynck
> wrote:
> > If you are on Windows (including Cygwin), you may also want to replace
> > "vimdiff" in the above command by either "vim.exe -d" or "gvim.exe -d"
> > with the .exe extension in order to bypass any *.bat wrappers. The
> >
On May 21, 5:42 am, Tony Mechelynck
wrote:
> If you are on Windows (including Cygwin), you may also want to replace
> "vimdiff" in the above command by either "vim.exe -d" or "gvim.exe -d"
> with the .exe extension in order to bypass any *.bat wrappers. The
> single quotes are essential on Unix
On 12/05/09 16:15, Gary Johnson wrote:
>
> On 2009-05-12, John Beckett wrote:
>> reuven wrote:
>>> I'm using vim -d to diff files, vim opens the second file in
>>> a narrow buffer, is there a way to split the side-by-side
>>> buffers equally be default?
>>
>> I don't think there is an easy option,
On 2009-05-12, John Beckett wrote:
> reuven wrote:
> > I'm using vim -d to diff files, vim opens the second file in
> > a narrow buffer, is there a way to split the side-by-side
> > buffers equally be default?
>
> I don't think there is an easy option, but just press Ctrl-w =
> to make the two
reuven wrote:
> I'm using vim -d to diff files, vim opens the second file in
> a narrow buffer, is there a way to split the side-by-side
> buffers equally be default?
I don't think there is an easy option, but just press Ctrl-w =
to make the two windows the same width (vertical split), or the
s
Hi,
I'm using vim -d to diff files, vim opens the second file in a narrow
buffer, is there a way to split the side-by-side buffers equally be
default?
Thanks,
Reuven.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information
10 matches
Mail list logo