Is it possible to have a pipe in formatprg?

Is it possible to have a pipe in formatprg? :setl formatprg=filer1|filter2 (I know I can't do *that*, but that's the idea...) /bpj -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For mor

Re: Is it possible to have a pipe in formatprg?

Reply to message «Is it possible to have a pipe in formatprg?», sent 17:12:48 13 December 2010, Monday by BPJ: Yes, it is. You either need to escape pipe symbol (because setl formatprg=filter1|filter2 and setl formatprg=filter1 filter2 are just the same), or use let, for example