Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-31 Thread Josef Fortier
Likewise, thanks! -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_us

Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-30 Thread Justin M. Keyes
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Justin Keyes wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Josef Fortier >> wrote: >> > I've only really actively used diff mode recently (as opposed to using it >> > as a visual diff tool). The default folding update on a change has le

Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-30 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Justin Keyes wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Josef Fortier > wrote: > > I've only really actively used diff mode recently (as opposed to using it > > as a visual diff tool). The default folding update on a change has led me > > astray more then once. > > > > I've learned the workaro

Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-29 Thread Josef Fortier
@Justin: You are talking about do/dp, right? Yep! I'm motivated by using fugitive for partial commits. I've been burned a few times, so I really want to be careful. The auto-folding makes it harder to confirm. zo and zc are better then what I was doing (pretty much what was suggested, but usin

Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-29 Thread Justin M. Keyes
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Josef Fortier wrote: > I've only really actively used diff mode recently (as opposed to using it as > a visual diff tool). The default folding update on a change has led me astray > more then once. > > I've learned the workaround only today, zo and zc, but the au

Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-29 Thread Marcin Szamotulski
On 22:38 Fri 28 Mar , Chris Jones wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:51:48PM EDT, Marcin Szamotulski wrote: > > > You can easily open all folds with zr. > > Or zR..if you have several levels of folding.. ? > > CJ In the diff mode you don't :) Regards, Marcin signature.asc Description:

Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-28 Thread Chris Jones
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 08:51:48PM EDT, Marcin Szamotulski wrote: > You can easily open all folds with zr. Or zR..if you have several levels of folding.. ? CJ -- -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. Fo

Re: Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-28 Thread Marcin Szamotulski
On 13:53 Fri 28 Mar , Josef Fortier wrote: > I've only really actively used diff mode recently (as opposed to using it as > a visual diff tool). The default folding update on a change has led me astray > more then once. > > I've learned the workaround only today, zo and zc, but the auto-fold

Suggestion for vim -diff behavior change

2014-03-28 Thread Josef Fortier
I've only really actively used diff mode recently (as opposed to using it as a visual diff tool). The default folding update on a change has led me astray more then once. I've learned the workaround only today, zo and zc, but the auto-folding behavior seems to me to be a real UI issue. I believ