On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 07:59, Tony Mechelynck
wrote:
> See
> :help script-here
> about how to make it work.
Thank you.
I've come up with the following as a way to deal with not having to
re-index lines on an un-modified buffer. Is there anything else I can
do? I realize this will probab
On 02/02/11 02:01, Alan Young wrote:
[...]
if has( 'perl' )
perl<< EOP
[...]
This use of if has() together with a here-document doesn't work because
a Vim without Perl can't properly parse the here-document when trying to
find the *matching* endif.
See
:help script-here
about how t
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 18:34, Marc Weber wrote:
> There is also a buffer local scope called b: which you may want to use.
That seems to have done the trick for that particular problem. Thank you.
--
Alan Young
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type you
Excerpts from Alan Young's message of Wed Feb 02 02:01:01 +0100 2011:
> The problem is with the 'did_perl_statusline' if construct. If I have
> this in place, then only the first perl file loaded will have the
> output appended to the status line. [..]
There is also a buffer local scope called b:
I have a problem and a couple of optimizations I'd like to get some
help with if I could.
I have the following in my '.vim/after/ftplugin/perl.vim' file:
--8<-
if ! exists("g:did_perl_statusline")
setlocal statusline+=%(\ %{StatusLineIndex
