On Sunday, April 7, 2013 11:50:09 PM UTC+12, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Actually, it is not quite right. I forgot, there could be several
> combining chars. So here is an updated patch.
I checked this using the manually assembled character "œ̄́" which firefox does
not render for me (gvim sort
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi William!
>
> On Fr, 05 Apr 2013, William Fugh wrote:
>
> > It's OK if execute the following in command-line directly
> > :%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g
> >
> > However, if like this:
> > :let @w = "%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g"
> > :@w
> > the combinations will be lost. :-(
>
Hi William!
On So, 07 Apr 2013, William Fugh wrote:
> BTW: Here is a patch.
> >
> > Well done, thank you guys so much. :-)
Actually, it is not quite right. I forgot, there could be several
combining chars. So here is an updated patch. Bram, please check.
regards,
Christian
--
Nett sein kann j
BTW: Here is a patch.
>
> Well done, thank you guys so much. :-)
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi William!
>
> On Fr, 05 Apr 2013, William Fugh wrote:
>
> > It's OK if execute the following in command-line directly
> > :%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g
> >
> > However, if li
On Sunday, April 7, 2013 9:13:55 AM UTC+12, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> BTW: Here is a patch.
Patch fixes it for me.
Regards, John
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit htt
Hi William!
On Fr, 05 Apr 2013, William Fugh wrote:
> It's OK if execute the following in command-line directly
> :%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g
>
> However, if like this:
> :let @w = "%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g"
> :@w
> the combinations will be lost. :-(
It's a combining char ;)
BTW: Here is a patch.
r
In gvim 7.3.882, gtk2-gnome gui, Kubuntu 12.10, I see the problem. (Also in
vim with uxterm.)
(They're more usually called "combining" characters, and your examples all have
what Unicode calls combining diacritical marks, f.ex.
̞
U+031E, COMBINING DOWN TACK BELOW
I mention this because I did n
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Ben Fritz wrote:
>
>
> I had to try it out to determine what you meant, but I reproduced the
> problem in Windows 7 64-bit, running Vim 7.3.822.
>
Thank you, Sir. Here is the thing.
Sometimes i have to execute a number of substitutions over and over again
from tes
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:53:16 PM UTC-5, William Fugh wrote:
> It's OK if execute the following in command-line directly
> :%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g
>
> However, if like this:
> :let @w = "%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g"
> :@w
> the combinations will be lost. :-(
>
>
I had to try it out to determine
It's OK if execute the following in command-line directly
:%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g
However, if like this:
:let @w = "%s#combinations#œ̄ṣ́#g"
:@w
the combinations will be lost. :-(
BTW, it is also strictly correct if put the command into a function and
call the function.
===
10 matches
Mail list logo
