Is there any possibility to make dib (or dab for that matter) ignore escaped
backslashes, e.g.
Current behavior:
"( \(a[cursor_here]bc) )" -> dib -> "() )"
Desired behavior:
"( \(a[cursor_here]bc) )" -> dib -> "( () )"
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post!
Addendum: I'm not looking for a macro/function but for a setting.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
On 00:59 Mon 22 Oct , Axel Bender wrote:
> Addendum: I'm not looking for a macro/function but for a setting.
>
> --
> You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
> Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
> For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/
I believe to remember that this wasn't so in earlier versions of GVim. Do you
by chance know, why this was changed? It - usually - comes relatively unhandy
when editing, e.g. Windows file names.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the
Am 22.10.2012 09:55 und 09:59, schrieb Axel Bender:
Is there any possibility to make dib (or dab for that matter) ignore
escaped backslashes, e.g.
Current behavior:
"( \(a[cursor_here]bc) )" -> dib -> "() )"
Desired behavior:
"( \(a[cursor_here]bc) )" -> dib -> "( () )"
Addendum: I'm not loo
On 01:21 Mon 22 Oct , Axel Bender wrote:
> I believe to remember that this wasn't so in earlier versions of GVim. Do you
> by chance know, why this was changed? It - usually - comes relatively unhandy
> when editing, e.g. Windows file names.
>
> --
> You received this message from the "vim_
In fact I don't see any influence of cpo+=M either. However I don't know if
there should be a change...
On the other hand there seems to be no other place at which we might toggle
this behavior.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the
On 08:32 Mon 22 Oct , Axel Bender wrote:
> In fact I don't see any influence of cpo+=M either. However I don't know if
> there should be a change...
> On the other hand there seems to be no other place at which we might toggle
> this behavior.
>
> --
> You received this message from the "vi
Hi Marcin!
On Mo, 22 Okt 2012, Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
> On 08:32 Mon 22 Oct , Axel Bender wrote:
> > In fact I don't see any influence of cpo+=M either. However I don't know if
> > there should be a change...
> > On the other hand there seems to be no other place at which we might toggle
On Mo, 22 Okt 2012, Andy Wokula wrote:
> Am 22.10.2012 09:55 und 09:59, schrieb Axel Bender:
> >Is there any possibility to make dib (or dab for that matter) ignore
> >escaped backslashes, e.g.
> >
> >Current behavior:
> >"( \(a[cursor_here]bc) )" -> dib -> "() )"
> >
> >Desired behavior:
> >"( \(
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> On Mo, 22 Okt 2012, Andy Wokula wrote:
>
> > Am 22.10.2012 09:55 und 09:59, schrieb Axel Bender:
> > >Is there any possibility to make dib (or dab for that matter) ignore
> > >escaped backslashes, e.g.
> > >
> > >Current behavior:
> > >"( \(a[cursor_here]bc) )" -> dib
On 2012-10-23 05:57, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
What language has a backslash for ( but not for )? We should handle
that in a more generic way then, not just for "dib".
Perl for one. See
$ perldoc perlref
/enumerated
Also something like /(...\(...)/ is very well
possible in a regular exp
12 matches
Mail list logo
