does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-14 Thread Jose Caballero
Hi, I am working on a host that didn't have ctags installed. I have just installed it. However, I think I am missing some step. After creating the tags file, opening a file with VIM and hitting CTRL+] on a string, it does not jump to the file with the definition. It just gives me a comment like

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-15 Thread Erik Christiansen
On 14.08.17 19:23, Jose Caballero wrote: > I am working on a host that didn't have ctags installed. I have just > installed it. The install order won't make any difference. Vim only needs to find a tags file you've generated. > However, I think I am missing some step. > After creating the tags fi

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-15 Thread Ben Fritz
On Monday, August 14, 2017 at 6:23:22 PM UTC-5, Jose Caballero wrote: > It is not a problem with the path, as I do first > > :set path+=** > 'path' option should not matter. What is your 'tags' option set to? Is it finding the tags file you expect (and only the tags file you expect)?

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-15 Thread Jose Caballero
Thanks Ben and Erik. Both tags files are identical: host1 $ md5sum tags 34e5413f4dea1c0644b35de7808a8029 tags host2 $ mad5sum tags 34e5413f4dea1c0644b35de7808a8029 tags Also tags are equal: :set tags? tags=./tags,./TAGS,tags,TAGS But, when hitting CTRL+] on top of a

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-15 Thread Benji Fisher
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Jose Caballero wrote: > Thanks Ben and Erik. > > Both tags files are identical: > > host1 $ md5sum tags > 34e5413f4dea1c0644b35de7808a8029 tags > > host2 $ mad5sum tags > 34e5413f4dea1c0644b35de7808a8029 tags > > Also tags are equal: > >:set

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-17 Thread Jose Caballero
2017-08-15 17:44 GMT-04:00 Benji Fisher : > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Jose Caballero > wrote: >> >> Thanks Ben and Erik. >> >> Both tags files are identical: >> >> host1 $ md5sum tags >> 34e5413f4dea1c0644b35de7808a8029 tags >> >> host2 $ mad5sum tags >> 34e5413f4dea1c0644b

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-17 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2017-08-17, Jose Caballero wrote: > In both cases, after trying a tag, :ts gives me the same, similar to > ># pri kind tag file > 1 F C iStatusInterface plugins/status/Plugin.py >from interfaces import StatusInterface > 2 F cStatus

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-17 Thread Jose Caballero
2017-08-17 14:51 GMT-04:00 Gary Johnson : > On 2017-08-17, Jose Caballero wrote: > >> In both cases, after trying a tag, :ts gives me the same, similar to >> >># pri kind tag file >> 1 F C iStatusInterface plugins/status/Plugin.py >>from interfaces

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-17 Thread Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov
2017-08-17 22:04 GMT+03:00 Jose Caballero : > 2017-08-17 14:51 GMT-04:00 Gary Johnson : >> On 2017-08-17, Jose Caballero wrote: >> >>> In both cases, after trying a tag, :ts gives me the same, similar to >>> >>># pri kind tag file >>> 1 F C iStatusInterface plugins/st

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-17 Thread Jose Caballero
2017-08-17 16:15 GMT-04:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov : > 2017-08-17 22:04 GMT+03:00 Jose Caballero : >> 2017-08-17 14:51 GMT-04:00 Gary Johnson : >>> On 2017-08-17, Jose Caballero wrote: >>> In both cases, after trying a tag, :ts gives me the same, similar to # pri kind tag

Re: does VIM read OK the tags file if ctags was installed after VIM?

2017-08-17 Thread Benji Fisher
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Jose Caballero wrote: > 2017-08-17 16:15 GMT-04:00 Nikolay Aleksandrovich Pavlov < > zyx@gmail.com>: > > 2017-08-17 22:04 GMT+03:00 Jose Caballero : > >> 2017-08-17 14:51 GMT-04:00 Gary Johnson : > >>> On 2017-08-17, Jose Caballero wrote: > >>> > In both