On Jun 29, 6:20 pm, Ted cecinemapasdera...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if there are some figures somewhere that would provide
some sort of estimate of the percentage of vim users who have python
installed, or would be free of objections to installing it if a module
required it. .
If I
On 30/06/10 03:20, Ted wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm wondering if there are some figures somewhere that would provide
some sort of estimate of the percentage of vim users who have python
installed, or would be free of objections to installing it if a module
required it. I'm working on some vim
Regarding the terminology:
My point of confusion with the term a vim script is that, in
addition to bearing a similarity to the vimscript or VimL
programming language, this can imply either of two other things:
- a package, downloadable from http://vim.org/scripts/script.php?
Hi Ted:
You're writing code for a system you've been using. You say its not
ready for release. Still you care much about portability and other users
(?). One design goal should be : Never over engineer. Do what you have
to do because things are going to change anyway.
Such a change could be a
On 06/30/2010 07:01 PM, Ted wrote:
Thanks to all for providing input on my question. I realized that the
demographic is a bit more restricted than the general population of
vim users; it is that portion thereof who actually install vim modules
at all. It's informative to learn that there are
On Wed, June 30, 2010 6:05 am, sc wrote:
i'd like to count myself among those who like a lean build
with no extra languages compiled in and as few plugins running
as possible
whatever your modules do i would not consider them if they
require a python enabled vim
Same is true for me. On
Hi Ted,
Go for Python because VimL can be a lock-in (speed issues if you want to
do a lot).
Can you tell more about what you're going to implement?
Maybe you want to get some ideas from my sbt plugin:
www.github.com/MarcWeber/vim-addon-sbt
It mocks Vim functionality so that you can test it
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:34:16 +0200, Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de
wrote:
Go for Python because VimL can be a lock-in (speed issues if you want to
do a lot).
Isn't it rather the opposite? If something requires Python it's at the
mercy of the availability of Python and the ability of Vim to
Thanks to all for providing input on my question. I realized that the
demographic is a bit more restricted than the general population of
vim users; it is that portion thereof who actually install vim modules
at all. It's informative to learn that there are some in that group
who would not be
Hello folks,
I'm wondering if there are some figures somewhere that would provide
some sort of estimate of the percentage of vim users who have python
installed, or would be free of objections to installing it if a module
required it. I'm working on some vim modules, to be released for
general
On 06/29/2010 09:20 PM, Ted wrote:
Hello folks,
I'm wondering if there are some figures somewhere that would provide
some sort of estimate of the percentage of vim users who have python
installed, or would be free of objections to installing it if a module
required it. I'm working on some
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:32 PM, AK andrei@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/29/2010 09:20 PM, Ted wrote:
I'm wondering if there are some figures somewhere that would provide
some sort of estimate of the percentage of vim users who have python
installed, or would be free of objections to
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 20:20:27 Ted wrote:
I'm wondering if there are some figures somewhere that would
provide some sort of estimate of the percentage of vim users
who have python installed, or would be free of objections to
installing it if a module required it. I'm working on some
I think you need just release your utility program, if people really
want it, they will not mind installing python. I personally aren't a
fans of python and will not bother to use vim with python albeit
python is installed here in linux.
--
regards,
14 matches
Mail list logo
