Bram wrote:
> Hmm, it's possible to make these commands not use 'scrolloff' when an
> operator is pending. It won't be consistent with other operations
> though. But it does make sense when 'scrolloff' is a large number,
> since it's then hard to estimate what text will be covered. While the
> f
Stucki wrote:
> On 10/11/17 um 04:58 Ben Fritz wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 1:57:38 PM UTC-5, Eli the Bearded wrote:
> >> I've long used scrolloff intermittantly, but recently I tried adding it
> >> to my vimrc. I'm finding myself unhappy now.
> ...
> >> What I would *expect* and wh
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> I don't use H/M/L but I do use PgUP/PgDn (whose effects are different)
> though never with an operator. My usual 'scrolloff' setting is 6.
I've been using H/M/L since before Vim existed. Frequently PgUp/PgDn did
not work without a manual :map in those days, and many keyboa
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Eli the Bearded
wrote:
> I've long used scrolloff intermittantly, but recently I tried adding it
> to my vimrc. I'm finding myself unhappy now.
>
> Straight from the scrolloff docs:
>
> *'scrolloff'* *'so'*
> 'scrollo
On 10/11/17 um 04:58 Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 1:57:38 PM UTC-5, Eli the Bearded wrote:
>> I've long used scrolloff intermittantly, but recently I tried adding it
>> to my vimrc. I'm finding myself unhappy now.
...
>> What I would *expect* and what I would like is if H and
On Tuesday, October 10, 2017 at 1:57:38 PM UTC-5, Eli the Bearded wrote:
> I've long used scrolloff intermittantly, but recently I tried adding it
> to my vimrc. I'm finding myself unhappy now.
>
> Straight from the scrolloff docs:
>
> *'scrolloff'* *
I've long used scrolloff intermittantly, but recently I tried adding it
to my vimrc. I'm finding myself unhappy now.
Straight from the scrolloff docs:
*'scrolloff'* *'so'*
'scrolloff' 'so'number (default 0, set to 5 in |defaults.vim|)
