Re: vim: fold all siblings

2013-03-12 Thread ping
On 3/11/2013 4:29 PM, Ben Fritz wrote: On Monday, March 11, 2013 2:53:10 PM UTC-5, ping wrote a big HTML formatted message, which the Google Groups interface mangles too much on reply to be worth quoting, where he asked how to unfold up to sibling folds. again HTML? I thought I carefully

Re: vim: fold all siblings

2013-03-12 Thread ping
On 3/12/2013 12:45 PM, ping wrote: On 3/11/2013 4:29 PM, Ben Fritz wrote: On Monday, March 11, 2013 2:53:10 PM UTC-5, ping wrote a big HTML formatted message, which the Google Groups interface mangles too much on reply to be worth quoting, where he asked how to unfold up to sibling folds.

Re: vim: fold all siblings

2013-03-12 Thread Ben Fritz
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:45:36 AM UTC-5, ping wrote: On 3/11/2013 4:29 PM, Ben Fritz wrote: On Monday, March 11, 2013 2:53:10 PM UTC-5, ping wrote a big HTML formatted message, which the Google Groups interface mangles too much on reply to be worth quoting, where he asked how to

vim: fold all siblings

2013-03-11 Thread ping
I've been trying most zKEYs , but haven't found oneto effectively fold all siblings(but not to close upto the parent fold). I knowzm , zc, zC, but they are not doing what I meant... think about this: { interface fxp0.0 { disable; } interface lo0.100 {

Re: vim: fold all siblings

2013-03-11 Thread Ben Fritz
On Monday, March 11, 2013 2:53:10 PM UTC-5, ping wrote a big HTML formatted message, which the Google Groups interface mangles too much on reply to be worth quoting, where he asked how to unfold up to sibling folds. Are you looking for the zr and zR commands? You mentioned trying zc, zC, zm,