-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think there's a problem with
http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/digraph.html .
1. the server doesn't say what character encoding is used
2. the HTML says
3. it only looks correct if I force it to be interpreted as UTF-8
HTH,
- -Adam
-BEGIN
On Mon, February 27, 2012 04:59, Adam Monsen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I think there's a problem with
> http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/digraph.html .
>
> 1. the server doesn't say what character encoding is used
> 2. the HTML says
> 3. it only looks correc
> I think there's a problem with
> http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/digraph.html .
>
> 1. the server doesn't say what character encoding is used
> 2. the HTML says
> 3. it only looks correct if I force it to be interpreted as UTF-8
I can confirm this behaviour with chromium and firefox.
Ma
On Feb 27, 3:37 am, "Christian Brabandt" wrote:
> On Mon, February 27, 2012 04:59, Adam Monsen wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
>
> > I think there's a problem with
> >http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/digraph.html.
>
> > 1. the server doesn't say what character e
Looks like this is still an issue.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Adam Monsen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I think there's a problem with
> http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/digraph.html .
>
> 1. the server doesn't say what character encoding is used
> 2. th
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Adam Monsen wrote:
> Looks like this is still an issue.
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Adam Monsen wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I think there's a problem with
>> http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/digraph.html .
>>
>
On Di, 15 Aug 2017, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Adam Monsen wrote:
> > Looks like this is still an issue.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Adam Monsen wrote:
> >> I think there's a problem with
> >> http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/digraph.html .
> >>
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Christian Brabandt wrote:
>
> On Di, 15 Aug 2017, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Adam Monsen wrote:
>> > Looks like this is still an issue.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Adam Monsen wrote:
>> >> I think th