--- On Tue, 11/30/10, John Carmonne wrote:
> From: John Carmonne
> Subject: Re: Ram doubler Re: David Pogue's Thanksgiving Wisdom on Vintage Tech
>
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Todd Brayer wrote:
>
> > Doesn't RAMdoubler demolish performance? It certainly
> did with my LCII.
> I remember
--- On Tue, 11/30/10, Todd Brayer wrote:
From: Todd Brayer
Subject: Re: Ram doubler Re: David Pogue's Thanksgiving Wisdom on Vintage Tech
To: vintage-macs@googlegroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 7:02 PM
Doesn't RAMdoubler demolish performance? It certainly did with my LCII.
--
Not if
On Nov 30, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Todd Brayer wrote:
Doesn't RAMdoubler demolish performance? It certainly did with my
LCII.
Todd Brayer
toddbra...@gmail.com
I remember RD and DD both disasters as far as I'm concerned. I
still have it on one of my Quadra's and have to make sure to boot
with
Doesn't RAMdoubler demolish performance? It certainly did with my LCII.
Todd Brayer
toddbra...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> --- On Tue, 11/30/10, Arnel Tuazon wrote:
>
> > Okay back on topic, with my IIsi I recently tried to use
> > RamDoubler
> > (remem
--- On Tue, 11/30/10, Arnel Tuazon wrote:
> Okay back on topic, with my IIsi I recently tried to use
> RamDoubler
> (remember that old software?) and see what would happen to
> the current 65MB
> (remember the IIsi has 1MB builtin RAM). Well it
> booted up fine, but as
> suspected it crashed oft
Greetings:
I have a working Powerbook 1400cs that I am trying to find a home
for. It needs a PRAM (backup) battery and naturally the battery is
gone that is with it. I have tested it, but would NOT be including
the power brick... as it goes with another of my vintage apple
laptops.
It currently
>
>From: Britt Dodd
>To: vintage-macs@googlegroups.com
>Sent: Tue, November 30, 2010 12:57:12 PM
>Subject: Re: Starmax 4000
>
>Both used IDE hard drives, which I am very much a fan of vs SCSI ones.
>
>I love my 6100, but something happened to its parts and I cant seem to locate
>them.
>
--
Wh
On 11/30/2010 2:23 PM, Joshua Juran wrote:
On Nov 26, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Britt Dodd wrote:
Well the solution I proposed is only one solution. You may or may not
be able to use localtalk. Localtalk is a low-speed (albeit speedy in
its day) communication protocol running at 230kbit/sec.
Etherne
Yeah I omitted the points that weren't applicable for the op's situation
On Nov 30, 2010 2:23 PM, "Joshua Juran" wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Britt Dodd wrote:
>
>> Well the solution I proposed is only one solution. You may or may
>> not be able to use localtalk. Localtalk is a low-speed
On Nov 26, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Britt Dodd wrote:
Well the solution I proposed is only one solution. You may or may
not be able to use localtalk. Localtalk is a low-speed (albeit
speedy in its day) communication protocol running at 230kbit/sec.
Ethernet, at 10Mbps, is over 40 times faster. Yo
Both used IDE hard drives, which I am very much a fan of vs SCSI ones.
I love my 6100, but something happened to its parts and I cant seem to
locate them.
--
-
You received this message because you are a member of the Vintage Macs group.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagem
On 11/30/2010 10:28 AM, Britt Dodd wrote:
Does anybody have one of these machines? I really liked it because I
could use a standard keyboard and mouse (and use a KVM switch to
switch it between my PC and MAC) and it was pretty quick.
I've also been looking for a 5400/200 for quite some time. I
Does anybody have one of these machines? I really liked it because I could
use a standard keyboard and mouse (and use a KVM switch to switch it between
my PC and MAC) and it was pretty quick.
I've also been looking for a 5400/200 for quite some time. I loved mine, but
it got stolen.
Know where I
On 11/29/10 6:42 PM, "John Needham" wrote:
> I really would like the 200 mhz board that came with the 8600. If I do not
> find it sometime soon, then I will drop you a line.
Keep in mind some 7300's shipped with 200 mhz. You might check
on the swap list and see if anyone has one they are not us
On 29/11/10 9:10 PM, "tortoise" wrote:
> Despite my agreement with David, I can't get over thinking that the
> Nokia N900 is both an iPhone killer and a Kindle killer and maybe even
> a netbook killer.
>
Really? Did you check out their specs? The iPhone and Droid phones have
faster processors
15 matches
Mail list logo
