I forget whether it was the IIci or IIcx, but when I pulled it apart, I was
surprised to notice signatures on the case... Going by
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Macintosh_models those models were
introduced after the SE.
Wesley
_
From: vintage-macs@googlegroups.com [mailto
The SE still had signatures, and the Easter Egg with the photo of the
then-development team burned into the ROM.
Jeff
On Sunday, October 20, 2013 6:30 PM, Dr. Hawkins wrote:
Oddly, this came up on one of my my lawyer mailing lists (yes, I'm subscribed
to two of those [three if you coun
What I remember was that the mold broke somewhere during SE production and the
new molds didn't have the signatures. So there are a number of SE's that have
signatures, but later model SE's did not.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 20, 2013, at 9:30 PM, "Dr. Hawkins"
mailto:doch...@gmail.com>> wrot
Not all SEs have the signatures. The latest models were produced without them
in the mold. As I recall, the last models to have them are the early run SE
FDHDs (later models reading SuperDrive don't seem to have them).
All Pluses have signatures, as do all earlier Macs. I believe the IIcx and II
You're right- was playing with my IIci and signatures are there - very nice
M
On Oct 21, 2013, at 3:43 AM, Wesley Furr wrote:
> I forget whether it was the IIci or IIcx, but when I pulled it apart, I was
> surprised to notice signatures on the case... Going by
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T
Hello,
> I forget whether it was the IIci or IIcx, but when I pulled it apart, I was
> surprised to notice signatures on the case... Going by
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Macintosh_models those models were
> introduced after the SE.
As near as I can make out, the answer seems to
