Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-27 Thread Mark Benson
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 03:04 AM, Jeff Walther wrote: My mistake for engaging in faulty reasoning. Installing an LC board in an LC475 case worked just fine for me. I mistakenly assumed that it works backwards just fine. That transmission tunnel style fan/speaker bracket was a criminal

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-26 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 07:14:32 -0800 From: "J.S. Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 10/25/03 6:56 PM, Jeff Walther at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:27:34 +0100 From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 07:23 AM, J.S. Garrison wrote: You'd be

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-26 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:56:35 + From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sunday, October 26, 2003, at 02:56 AM, Jeff Walther wrote: On the LC475, the fan and speaker have wires with plugs at the end I know - I wrote a how-to on changing the logic board a year ago and I've cleaned, upgrade

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-26 Thread J.S. Garrison
on 10/25/03 6:56 PM, Jeff Walther at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:27:34 +0100 >> From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 07:23 AM, J.S. Garrison wrote: > >> The LC is always gonna be heeled by it's bad bus and low RAM ceiling. >> You'

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-26 Thread Mark Benson
On Sunday, October 26, 2003, at 02:56 AM, Jeff Walther wrote: Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:27:34 +0100 From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 07:23 AM, J.S. Garrison wrote: The LC is always gonna be heeled by it's bad bus and low RAM ceiling. You'd be better off buy

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-25 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 09:27:34 +0100 From: Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 07:23 AM, J.S. Garrison wrote: The LC is always gonna be heeled by it's bad bus and low RAM ceiling. You'd be better off buying an LC475 board for $5 and putting that in, but then I dunno

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-25 Thread Marco van de Voort
> On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 07:23 AM, J.S. Garrison wrote: > > > I suppose this Speedster is REALLY just designed to provide quicker > > access to > > often used applications. NOT for Internet Access. . > > Some 68k upgrade cards had RAM sockets on them for extra memory. Sadly > not thi

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-25 Thread J.S. Garrison
on 10/25/03 1:27 AM, Mark Benson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This is an interesting Accelerator. Not as much fun as those which fit >> into >> the IIci's and such, but it DOES provide a quicker LC than the stock >> box. > > The LC is always gonna be heeled by it's bad bus and low RAM ceiling.

Re: Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-25 Thread Mark Benson
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 07:23 AM, J.S. Garrison wrote: Sadly, even tho' there's a 68040/40 CPU in this Mac, it KNOWS it's still a 68020 Mac. O.T. won't work. All Apple's apps for 68ks install stuff depending on the Gestalt ID. You can get programs to jury rig that so stuff for newer ma

Critiques On An Accelerated Mac

2003-10-24 Thread J.S. Garrison
This is simply a sort of rant on the LC Speedster and it's ilk from long ago. Having put the repaired Mobius LC Speedster into one of my LC's, I set it up and tried loading some standard software on it. Open Transport, OT PPP, and I.E. 3.01. Sadly, even tho' there's a 68040/40 CPU in this Mac, it