: Sunday, September 09, 2001 12:02
Subject: RMore LC III vs. LC III+
> At 11:50 PM -0400 9/8/2001, Receipts wrote:
> >LC III vs. LC III+
> >
> >Does anyone know the definitive difference between the LC III and the LC
III+.
> >
> >I initially believed that the:
> >
At 11:50 PM -0400 9/8/2001, Receipts wrote:
>LC III vs. LC III+
>
>Does anyone know the definitive difference between the LC III and the LC III+.
>
>I initially believed that the:
> III was a 16bit bus and a 25mhz CPU
> III+ was a 32bit bus and a 3
At 11:50 PM -0400 9/8/2001, Receipts wrote:
>LC III vs. LC III+
>
>Does anyone know the definitive difference between the LC III and the LC III+.
>
>I initially believed that the:
> III was a 16bit bus and a 25mhz CPU
> III+ was a 32bit bus and a 3
> Reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vintage Macs)
> To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vintage Macs)
> Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 23:50:01 -0400
> From: Receipts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: LC III vs. LC III+
> LC III vs. LC III+
Just clockspeed. LCIII is 25MHz, LCIII+ is 33MHz. As far as the bus width, I
can't remember. But I do remember that the bus width is the same on both,
and double what it is on the LC and LCII.
Terry
> Does anyone know the definitive difference between the LC III and the LC
III+.
--
Vintage Mac
LC III vs. LC III+
Does anyone know the definitive difference between the LC III and the LC III+.
I initially believed that the:
III was a 16bit bus and a 25mhz CPU
III+ was a 32bit bus and a 33mhz CPU
But I see contradictions all over the place, with sites stating that the
