Re: *Not* moving to Google Groups?

As long as your discussion doesn't contain discussion about things like terrorism, bomb making, high-value government targets, culturing anthrax, dirty bombs or other illegal activity you shouldn't have anything to worry about. Go back to huddling in the corner by the door with your shotgun, mumbli

Re: *Not* moving to Google Groups?

On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:50:49 -0600 Dennis Myhand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, for all the "paranoid goofs" out there, once you send an > e-mail, there is a copy of it on EVERY e-mail server it passes through. > That is how Mr. Gates was nailed in the anti-trust trial. Well, before >

Re: *Not* moving to Google Groups?

Actually, for all the "paranoid goofs" out there, once you send an e-mail, there is a copy of it on EVERY e-mail server it passes through. That is how Mr. Gates was nailed in the anti-trust trial. Well, before the US Justice Department sold out, anyway.It isn't just "Once on the web, alwa

Re: *Not* moving to Google Groups?

for all you paranoid goofs out there heres a bit more info on the supposed evil that is google each time a message is sent through this list; guess what... its stored in my -gmail- account... for ---every message posted on usenet... regardless if google is involved or not its stored by google--

Re: Moving to Google Groups

on 1/30/06 5:19 PM, Eddie Smith at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 13:11 30/01/2006 -0500, you wrote: >> Hey, listmom! >> >> Now here's some real IRONY! Your decision to move lists to Google Groups >> now makes it possible for HTML to appear on the lists. >> >> Willi > Can I receive the new ver

Re: Moving to Google Groups

on 1/30/06 2:03 PM, Doug McNutt at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > At 13:37 -0500 1/30/06, Daniel wrote: >> I am not interested in intentionally populating Google's database with more >> information about me. > > I does appear that the Google groups can be used in the same way that Yahoo > groups do.

Re: Moving to Google Groups

At 13:11 30/01/2006 -0500, you wrote: Hey, listmom! Now here's some real IRONY! Your decision to move lists to Google Groups now makes it possible for HTML to appear on the lists. Willi What it will cause problems with, if it is the same as other groups I'm on, is the people that opt for

*Not* moving to Google Groups?

If anyone is interested in creating an alternative on Usenet to the new 680x0-Macs list on Google Groups, e-mail me off the list. -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Ca

Re: Moving to Google Groups

At 13:37 -0500 1/30/06, Daniel wrote: >I am not interested in intentionally populating Google's database with more >information about me. I does appear that the Google groups can be used in the same way that Yahoo groups do. You can subscribe and control using the old-fashioned mail addresses.

Re: Moving to Google Groups

A while back, Doug McNutt wrote: So I went to Google. They want me to subscribe to essentially all of Google with a whole lot of verbiage to read and agree to. It's in a tiny scrolling window apparently purposely designed to be unreadable.. Given the resulting exposure to Google's filing sys

Re: Moving to Google Groups

Hey, listmom! Quoting Dan Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: <--- snip ---> > Dan Knight, president /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign > Cobweb Publishing, Inc.\ / No HTML/RTF in email > X No Word docs in email > / \ Respect Open

Moving to Google Groups

After reading discussion over the weekend, let me clarify a few things. Google Groups functions as an email group, so the format of posting and receiving messages can be exactly the same as you're used to. In addition, you can read, search, and reply to messages online, something you couldn't d

Re: Moving to Google Groups

So I went to Google. They want me to subscribe to essentially all of Google with a whole lot of verbiage to read and agree to. It's in a tiny scrolling window apparently purposely designed to be unreadable.. Given the resulting exposure to Google's filing system I'm not so sure I want to do th

Re: Moving to Google Groups

I'm sure there's a lot of call for a list devoted to 680x0-powered Mac minis and for users of that peculiar hybrid, the Intel 680x0 processor. (That's the model that ran System 6.1, right?) At 3:43 PM -0500 1/27/06, Dan Knight wrote: Fans of 680x0 Macs, we've successfully launched our first

Re: Moving to Google Groups

good... threaded messages... hopefully no more toppost/bottompost arguments... and hopefully no more spam stuck to the bottom of the messages On 27/01/06, Dan Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fans of 680x0 Macs, we've successfully launched our first two email > lists using Google Groups - o

Re: Moving to Google Groups

Steve (and others), You don't have to use the web to join Google Groups. I just copied the following from the Groups website: - Can I subscribe to a Google Group via email? Yes, you can both subscribe to and unsubscribe from a Google Group via email. To subscribe, send an email to [EMAIL

Re: Moving to Google Groups

I don't like the move to google groups as it makes one have to go to the groups, many of which my Public Library blocks (no rhyme or reason as to whats blocked). I prefer the current format since I can look at the messages while doing the rest of my email. Steve On 1/27/06, Dan Knight <[EMAIL PRO

Moving to Google Groups

Fans of 680x0 Macs, we've successfully launched our first two email lists using Google Groups - one for Macintel models and one for the Mac mini. As of this afternoon, we've turned off our three "Maclone" lists, which have also transitioned to Google Groups. Advantages: You can browse messages