If possible I'd like to get some opinions on the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623188
Obviously, I believe that virt-manager should be defaulting to disabling
caching for disks backed by raw volumes as qemu suggests. There is a
huge performance difference i
On 14 August 2010 00:16, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> If possible I'd like to get some opinions on the following bug report:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=623188
>
> Obviously, I believe that virt-manager should be defaulting to disabling
> caching for disks backed by raw volumes as
On 08/16/2010 09:06 AM, Jon Nordby wrote:
This is very likely because you filed against the libvirt product in
bugzilla and not virt-manager, and it was not clear from context that
you meant virt-manager. If it says that you should do that on the
webpage, please state where so it can be fixed.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600853
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600855
are both duplicates of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600852
--
Regards Jon Nordby - www.jonnor.com
___
virt-tools-list mailing list
virt