Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:16:53PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446161
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
I'm not 100% sure that this would be the desirable behavior. If one runs
the app in -k, isn't
Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:16:52PM -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446161
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
Acked-by: Victor Toso
Seems to be a regression from:
commit
Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446161
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
---
src/virt-viewer-app.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/virt-viewer-app.c b/src/virt-viewer-app.c
index f0fcf21..1975af0 100644
---
Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1446161
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
---
src/virt-viewer-window.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/virt-viewer-window.c b/src/virt-viewer-window.c
index
The cb_add_new_pool callback will add a newly created storage pool
into virt-manager's cache so we don't have to wait for the libvirt
event to be handled.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435064
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina
---
This is not ideal