On 02/17/2016 01:22 PM, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
>>> I disagree, but again, I think it is basically a matter of
>>> preference.
>>
>> It is. From the macro name it is not clear for me how is different
>> "GOTO_END" from "goto end"
>
> For what it's worth, I agree with Pavel here. I think it
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 17:17 +0100, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 13:21 -0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> > On 02/16/2016 10:41 AM, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 19:22 -0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> > > > Most of this patch consists in
On Tue, 2016-02-16 at 13:21 -0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 10:41 AM, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 19:22 -0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> > > Most of this patch consists in code being shuffled around to fit
> > > the
> > > expected flow while
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 19:22 -0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>> Most of this patch consists in code being shuffled around to fit the
>> expected flow while using the new APIs. I tried my best to make this
>>
On 02/16/2016 10:41 AM, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 19:22 -0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>> Most of this patch consists in code being shuffled around to fit the
>> expected flow while using the new APIs. I tried my best to make this
>> patch the less intrusive as
Hi,
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 19:22 -0200, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> Most of this patch consists in code being shuffled around to fit the
> expected flow while using the new APIs. I tried my best to make this
> patch the less intrusive as possible. Main changes are:
>
> - Updated build
Most of this patch consists in code being shuffled around to fit the
expected flow while using the new APIs. I tried my best to make this
patch the less intrusive as possible. Main changes are:
- Updated build requirements
* glib version 2.38
* gtk+ version 3.10
* gio
- VirtViewerApp is