On Wed, 2016-08-10 at 09:35 -0300, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 07:41 AM, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 17:44 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Just connect to
On 08/10/2016 07:41 AM, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 17:44 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
>>>
>>> Just connect to the signal
>>
>> I'm tempted to ask "why?". I think it's recommended (more efficient) to
>> just
On 08/09/2016 12:44 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
>> Just connect to the signal
>
> I'm tempted to ask "why?". I think it's recommended (more efficient) to
> just override the vfunc directly when you can (ie when you derive a new
>
On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 17:44 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> >
> > Just connect to the signal
>
> I'm tempted to ask "why?". I think it's recommended (more efficient) to
> just override the vfunc directly when you can (ie when you
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote:
> Just connect to the signal
I'm tempted to ask "why?". I think it's recommended (more efficient) to
just override the vfunc directly when you can (ie when you derive a new
widget) rather than connecting to a signal.
Christophe
Just connect to the signal
---
src/virt-viewer-display.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/virt-viewer-display.c b/src/virt-viewer-display.c
index 2dbaba1..20ae9af 100644
--- a/src/virt-viewer-display.c
+++ b/src/virt-viewer-display.c
@@ -91,7 +91,6 @@
