Re: [virt-tools-list] [virt-viewer][PATCH 1/3 v2] cfg.mk: Don't require bindtextdomain directly

2012-11-21 Thread Martin Kletzander
On 11/14/2012 10:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: With current implementation, all binaries that need it call bindtextdomain but not directly. They call a helper function instead. This makes, however, syntax-check fail as it cannot recognize it. Original patch proposed by Eric Blake

Re: [virt-tools-list] [virt-viewer][PATCH 1/3 v2] cfg.mk: Don't require bindtextdomain directly

2012-11-21 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 21.11.2012 17:32, Martin Kletzander wrote: On 11/14/2012 10:58 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: With current implementation, all binaries that need it call bindtextdomain but not directly. They call a helper function instead. This makes, however, syntax-check fail as it cannot recognize it.

[virt-tools-list] [virt-viewer][PATCH 1/3 v2] cfg.mk: Don't require bindtextdomain directly

2012-11-14 Thread Michal Privoznik
With current implementation, all binaries that need it call bindtextdomain but not directly. They call a helper function instead. This makes, however, syntax-check fail as it cannot recognize it. Original patch proposed by Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com --- cfg.mk |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2