On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>> A long time ago we used to depend on libvirt-glib for the glib event
>> loop integration. On commit 296f91c it got dropped in favor of
>> keeping
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> A long time ago we used to depend on libvirt-glib for the glib event
> loop integration. On commit 296f91c it got dropped in favor of
> keeping everything into virt-viewer tree because libvirt-glib was not
> mature enough. Well,
Hi,
Series looks good!
Acked-by: Victor Toso
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:32:04PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> A long time ago we used to depend on libvirt-glib for the glib event
> loop integration. On commit 296f91c it got dropped in favor of
> keeping everything into
A long time ago we used to depend on libvirt-glib for the glib event
loop integration. On commit 296f91c it got dropped in favor of
keeping everything into virt-viewer tree because libvirt-glib was not
mature enough. Well, that's not the case anymore, so let's bring
the dependency back.
You also