Hi,
>
>
> On 02/08/2017 07:24 AM, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> > Hi Halil,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments firstly.
> >
>
> You are welcome :). Sorry it took so long -- I'm currently
> quite busy.
>
It's fine.
> >>
> >> On 01/18/2017 09:22 AM, Gonglei wrote:
> >>> The virtio crypto device is a v
On 02/09/2017 06:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
[...]
>> [...]
>>> Note: should this proposal be accepted and approved, one or more
>>> claims disclosed to the TC admin and listed on the Virtio TC
>>> IPR page https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/ipr.php
>>> might becom
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 04:48:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 08/02/2017 20:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > We couldn't decide what's better for everyone in 1.0 days and I doubt
> > we'll be able to now, but yes, benchmarking is needed to make
> > sire it's required. Very easy to remo
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:37:57PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 02/08/2017 04:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> [...]
> > * Prototype
> >
> > A partial prototype can be found under
> > tools/virtio/ringtest/ring.c
> >
> > Test run:
> > [mst@tuck ringtest]$ time ./ring
> > real0m
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:48:53 +0100
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/02/2017 20:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > We couldn't decide what's better for everyone in 1.0 days and I doubt
> > we'll be able to now, but yes, benchmarking is needed to make
> > sire it's required. Very easy to remove or not to
On 08/02/2017 20:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> We couldn't decide what's better for everyone in 1.0 days and I doubt
> we'll be able to now, but yes, benchmarking is needed to make
> sire it's required. Very easy to remove or not to use/support in
> drivers/devices though.
Fair enough, but of
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 03:46:53 +
"Gonglei (Arei)" wrote:
> Hi Cornelia,
>
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:39:44 +0100
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> > > On 01/18/2017 09:22 AM, Gonglei wrote:
>
> > > > +The following services are defined:
> > > > +
> > > > +\begin{lstlisting}
> > > > +/* CIPHER
