On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:23:22AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 20:18 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > BTW, WRT RT woes with $subject, I tried booting a generic kernel with
> > threadirqs, and bingo, same deal, just a bit more painful than for RT,
> > where there's no wat
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:23:22AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 20:18 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > BTW, WRT RT woes with $subject, I tried booting a generic kernel with
> > threadirqs, and bingo, same deal, just a bit more painful than for RT,
> > where there's no wat
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 02:55:33PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> On 03/17/2017 05:28 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:08:46 +0800 Wei Wang wrote:
> >
> > > From: Liang Li
> > >
> > > This patch adds a function to provides a snapshot of the present system
> > > unused pages. An imp
On 03/28/2017 01:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
VIRTIO-84 added a requirement that each buffer is > header size but
there's no reason to require that for merge-able buffers since data can
be placed in follow-up buffers.
The current wording seems confusing enough that it seems likely
no one r
On 03/28/2017 01:09 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
The idea behind mergeable buffers was to simply use them in a way
similar to a chain of descriptors. Unfortunately the current text does
not say so - apparently nothing says device can't spread a packet over
as many buffers as it likes - but th
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:56:24PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:09:48PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:07:29AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:29:43PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > > Hi Michael,
> > > >
> > > >
