Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] snd: Add virtio sound device specification

2019-11-21 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
> Feature bits > > > VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_OUTPUT > VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_INPUT > > and new ones would be > > VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_EVT_PERIOD - support elapsed period notifications > VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_EVT_XRUN - support underrun/overrun notifications > VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_MSG - support message-based

Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] snd: Add virtio sound device specification

2019-11-21 Thread Anton Yakovlev
Again, thank you all for your valuable comments! There were quite a lot of suggestions, so I briefly gathered all of them. Feature bits VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_OUTPUT VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_INPUT and new ones would be VIRTIO_SND_F_PCM_EVT_PERIOD - support elapsed period notifications VIRTIO_S

Re: [virtio-dev] [RFC RESEND] virtio-video: Add virtio video device specification

2019-11-21 Thread Dmitry Sepp
Hi Gerd, On Mittwoch, 20. November 2019 12:29:29 CET Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > 3. No support for getting plane requirements from the device (sg vs > > > > > contig, > > > > > size, stride alignment, plane count). > > > > > > > > There is actually a bigger difference that results i

Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] snd: Add virtio sound device specification

2019-11-21 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > > In general if I have guest core affinity then hypervisor context > > switching for that guest is in low 10s of uS (depends on hypervisor > > of course and HW). This is good enough for low latency audio. > That's why we are really curious how other people target such issues > with audio

Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH RESEND v4 1/1] Add virtio-iommu device specification

2019-11-21 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:44:51 +0100 Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:27:34PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > +\begin{lstlisting} > > > +struct virtio_iommu_config { > > > + le64 page_size_mask; > > > + struct virtio_iommu_range_64 { > > > +le64 start; > > > +le