On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:28 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 11:27 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:04 AM Gerd Hoffmann
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:00:25PM
Hi,
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h
kernel <-> userspace API.
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_gpu.h
host <-> guest API.
Please create sepparate patches for these.
thanks,
Gerd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
> +enum virtio_gpu_shm_id {
> + VIRTIO_GPU_SHM_ID_UNDEFINED = 0,
> + VIRTIO_GPU_SHM_ID_HOST_VISIBLE = 1
> +};
I think this is also not in the virtio spec update.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:00:25PM -0700, Gurchetan Singh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:15 PM Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> > Hi Gurchetan,
> >
> > Now Miklos has queued, these tree virtio patches for shared memory
> > region in his tree as part of virtiofs dax patch series.
> >
> > I am hoping
Hi,
> @@ -100,7 +102,7 @@ struct drm_virtgpu_resource_info {
> __u32 bo_handle;
> __u32 res_handle;
> __u32 size;
> - __u32 stride;
> + __u32 blob_mem;
> };
Huh? This is not in the virtio spec update proposed.
> struct drm_virtgpu_3d_box {
> @@ -117,6 +119,8 @@
