Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a PCI device that implements a transport for virtio. It
allows virtio
devices to be used by QEMU based VMMs like KVM or Xen.
+
+/* the notify funct
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a PCI device that implements a transport for virtio. It
allows virtio
devices to be used by QEMU based VMMs like KVM or Xen.
+
+/* the notify function used when creating a virt queue */
+static v
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 04:42:48PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> - wrmsrl(MSR_CSTAR, ia32_cstar_target);
> + wrmsrl(MSR_CSTAR, (u64)ia32_cstar_target);
Hmm, why do you add explicit casts? The compiler should convert that
correctly on its own.
> +static inline void wrmsrl(unsig
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:20:15AM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> skb is only NULL the first time around: it's more correct to test for
> being under-budget.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That looks better to me.
Acked-by: Simon Horman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> diff -r 2a94425
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a PCI device that implements a transport for virtio. It
allows virtio
devices to be used by QEMU based VMMs like KVM or Xen.
+
+/* the notify function used when creating a virt queue */
+static void vp_notify(str
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a PCI device that implements a transport for virtio. It
allows virtio
devices to be used by QEMU based VMMs like KVM or Xen.
+
+/* the notify function used when creating a virt queue */
+static void vp_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
+{
+struc
Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a PCI device that implements a transport for virtio. It allows virtio
devices to be used by QEMU based VMMs like KVM or Xen.
+
+/* the notify function used when creating a virt queue */
+static void vp_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
+{
+ struct virtio_pci_devi
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 17:16:45 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > i dont think there's ever any true need (and good cause) to force
> > integer type casts like that at the callee site.
>
> Unless you mean we should do something like this:
>
> static inline voi
