Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +/* We are done with this skb: put it in the used pile. */
> +static void skb_finished(struct skb_shared_info *sinfo)
> +{
> + struct skb_shinfo_tun *sht = (void *)(sinfo + 1);
> +
> + /* FIXME: Race prevention */
> + vring_used_buffer_
The 'disable_cb' callback is designed as an optimization to tell the host
we don't need callbacks now. As it is not reliable, the debug check is
overzealous: it can happen on two CPUs at the same time. Document this.
Even if it were reliable, the virtio_net driver doesn't disable
callbacks on tr
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:38 AM, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>> so will cost every bzImage extra memory copy? that could be 18M or
>>> even more big.
>>>
>> I wouldn't worry about that. You will typically have several copies of the
>> imag
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> so will cost every bzImage extra memory copy? that could be 18M or
> even more big.
I wouldn't worry about that. You will typically have several copies of
the images during the execution of the boot loader.
-hpa
___
Virtual
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 00:03 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> so will cost every bzImage extra memory copy? that could be 18M or
> even more big.
Is it a huge deal for something that happens exactly once on boot? How
does the time take compare with the time to do the decompression?
18M seems like an aw
Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Compared with V9, just fixed indentation issues in patch 12. I put it
> the patchset in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiantao/kvm-ia64.git
> kvm-ia64-mc10. Please help to review.
> Specially, the first two patches (TR Management patch and
> smp_call_functi
On Sunday 06 April 2008 12:56:33 pm Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sunday 06 April 2008 00:53:39 Balaji Rao wrote:
> > On Friday 04 April 2008 01:46:21 pm Balaji Rao wrote:
> > > Hi Rusty,
> > >
> > > I hit a bug in virtio_ring.c:218 when I was stressing virtio_net using
> > > kvm with -smp 4.
> > >
> >
On Sunday 06 April 2008 00:53:39 Balaji Rao wrote:
> On Friday 04 April 2008 01:46:21 pm Balaji Rao wrote:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > I hit a bug in virtio_ring.c:218 when I was stressing virtio_net using
> > kvm with -smp 4.
> >
> > static void vring_disable_cb(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > {
> >
