On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 07:49:56AM +0530, Haneef Syed wrote:
Yes.. Host kernel oop like below.. Both Host and guest goes to deadlock
condition.
This oops doesn't look kvm specific. Try to run with -net none.
Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com
Sent by: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org
07/23/2009
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:44:16 +0900 (JST)
Ryo Tsuruta r...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
good solution to resolve such problem.
My point is don't allow anyone to use bandwidth of others.
Considering job isolation, a thread who requests swap-out should be charg=
ed
against bandwidth.
From
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:44:16 +0900 (JST)
Ryo Tsuruta r...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
good solution to resolve such problem.
My point is don't allow anyone to use bandwidth of others.
Considering job isolation, a thread who requests
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:27:31 pm Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
msix_user_vectors counted both per-vq and shared/config vectors.
This causes BUG_ON when device is removed, as
free_vectors tries to free per-vq vectors.
OK, I looked at this patch, then looked at this code (after it was applied).
I'm
On Tue, 21 July 2009 01:46:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 17 July 2009, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ typedef struct _RING_BUFFER {
// volatile u32 InterruptMask;
// Ring data starts here + RingDataStartOffset !!! DO NOT place any
fields below this
On Fri, 24 July 2009 14:50:25 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:32:19 +0200
Jörn Engel jo...@logfs.org wrote:
On Tue, 21 July 2009 01:46:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
The data structure is actually packed already, the attribute does not
make it better
and
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:32:19 +0200
Jörn Engel jo...@logfs.org wrote:
On Tue, 21 July 2009 01:46:41 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 17 July 2009, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ typedef struct _RING_BUFFER {
// volatile u32 InterruptMask;
// Ring data
