Ben Greear wrote:
> Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have
> to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way
> you'll probably get a big performance hit.
Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a
veth-->bridge-->veth configura
On (Wed) Aug 05 2009 [09:33:40], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:34:33 am Amit Shah wrote:
> > We expose multiple char devices ("ports") for simple communication
> > between the host userspace and guest.
>
> Hi Amit,
>
>OK, seems like it's time for some serious review. Below.
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:34:33 am Amit Shah wrote:
> We expose multiple char devices ("ports") for simple communication
> between the host userspace and guest.
Hi Amit,
OK, seems like it's time for some serious review. Below.
> +config VIRTIO_SERIAL
> + tristate "Virtio serial"
> + sel
On 08/04/09 10:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 19:29 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
>
>>> So its going to split user time into user and guest. Does that really
>>> make sense? For the host kernel it really is just another user process,
>>> no?
>>>
>> The code (at lea
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:33:14 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 19:29 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> > > So its going to split user time into user and guest. Does that really
> > > make sense? For the host kernel it really is just another user process,
> > > no?
> >
> > T
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 19:29 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > So its going to split user time into user and guest. Does that really
> > make sense? For the host kernel it really is just another user process,
> > no?
>
> The code (at least in parts) is already upstream. Look at the
> account_gu
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:26:41 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 17:07 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:16:38 +0200
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > These patches never seem to have made it onto LKML?!
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 15:13 +0200,
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 17:07 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:16:38 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > These patches never seem to have made it onto LKML?!
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 15:13 +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > > The aim of these four patches is to introduc
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:16:38 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> These patches never seem to have made it onto LKML?!
>
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 15:13 +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time
> > accounting.
> >
> > _Ingo_, as these patches m
These patches never seem to have made it onto LKML?!
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 15:13 +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time accounting.
>
> _Ingo_, as these patches modify files of the scheduler, could you have a look
> to
> them, please ?
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
