* Laurent Vivier wrote:
> [PATCH 2/4] like for cpustat, introduce the "gtime" (guest time of
> the task) and "cgtime" (guest time of the task children) fields
> for the tasks. Modify signal_struct and task_struct. Modify
> /proc//stat to display these new fields.
> --- kvm.orig/include/linux
Ben Greear wrote:
> Or Gerlitz wrote:
>> Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a
>> veth-->bridge-->veth configuration gives about 400K PPS forwarding
>> performance where macvlan-->veth-->macvlan gives 680K PPS (again, I
>> made sure that the bridge has applied learning befor
On (Wed) Aug 05 2009 [09:33:40], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:34:33 am Amit Shah wrote:
> > We expose multiple char devices ("ports") for simple communication
> > between the host userspace and guest.
>
> Hi Amit,
>
>OK, seems like it's time for some serious review. Below.
Or Gerlitz wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>> Well, it seems we could and should fix veth to work, but it will have
>> to do equivalent work of copying an skb most likely, so either way
>> you'll probably get a big performance hit.
> Using the same pktgen script (i.e with clone=0) I see that a
> vet
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Have you considered using a usb serial device? Something attractive
> about it is that a productid/vendorid can be specified which means that
> you can use that as a method of enumerating devices.
>
> Hot add/remove is supported automagically
Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:14:18PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > But why do we want to limit the device to only one port? It's not too
> > complex supporting additional ones.
> >
> > As I see it qemu and the kernel should provide the basic abstraction for
> > the userspace to g
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Have you considered using a usb serial device? Something attractive
>> about it is that a productid/vendorid can be specified which means that
>> you can use that as a method of enumerating devices.
>>
>> Hot add/r
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 02:57:01PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 06:44:28PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> It really suggests that you need _one_ vmchannel that's exposed to
>>> userspace with a single userspace daemon that consumes